No. Becoz, This Title/Person Belongs to Bengali/Hindu Barendra (Srostriyo) Brahmin.
The title "Son of David" is used for the Messiah because it signifies the lineage of the promised deliverer. The Messiah was prophesied to come from the line of David in the Old Testament, specifically in passages like 2 Samuel 7:12-16. By calling the Messiah the "Son of David," it emphasizes that he is the rightful heir to David's throne and fulfills the messianic expectations of the Jewish people.
the son of David
I don't understand what your question is.
David Cameron belongs to the Church of England (Anglican)
A Son of David was created in 1920-02.
David Cameron's son had Epilepsy
It belongs to the other person on the title.
Solomon, not David, had a son Rehoboam, who had a son named Abijam. this is in 1 Kings 14:31.
If Jesus was the messiah the first question asked would be "is he of the house of David?" Any claim to be the Messiah would have to pass this genealogical test. Every devout Jew knew that the Messiah would come from the lineage of David. So Matthew traces Christ's genealogy through the royal line of David. The title 'son of David' also links Jesus with humanity.
King David wept for the son that Bathsheba had and for Absalom.
Use "son's" when referring to something that belongs to one son. Use "sons'" when referring to something that belongs to multiple sons. For example, "My son's toy is on the floor" (one son), or "The sons' room needs to be cleaned" (multiple sons).