0
True or False unfunded federal mandates on the states were outlawed byt the US Supreme court in Hammar v Dagenhart?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
false
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the Supreme Court decide in Hammer v Dagenhart?
there was nothing they didn't do nothing but act stupid dang what were they thinking jk buhh wat up yall
What provided constitutional justification for segregation for almost sixty years?
The Supreme Court ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson is what provided constitutional justification for segregation. Segregation in public schools was outlawed in another Supreme Court ruling in 1954.
Can the Executive branch prosecute someone on a statute that the US Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional?
No. Once a statute is declared unconstitutional, it becomes unenforceable. Congress can rewrite the law to comply with constitutional mandates on the basis of the Supreme Court's decision, however, which they often do. So a person may be prosecuted under new or revised legislation that is substantially similar to the original legislation.
Are tribunals inferior to the US Supreme Court?
Yes. Article III, Section 1 mandates one Supreme Court and refers to other courts (and tribunals) as inferior:Article III, Section 1Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
Which Article in the US Constitution established the US Supreme Court and federal court system?
Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution mandates establishment of one Supreme Court, but leaves creation of the lower courts to Congress' discretion.Article IIISection 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Hammer v Dagenhart?
there was nothing they didn't do nothing but act stupid dang what were they thinking jk buhh wat up yall
Sit down strikes were so successful that?
The Supreme Court Outlawed Them.
What amendment is polygamy in?
Polygamy is not in any amendment, it was outlawed by a Supreme Court decision.
What year Gerrymandering was outlawed by Wesberry v Sanders?
Wesberry v. Sanders was settled by the Supreme Court in 1964. It didn't outlaw Gerrymandering, it instituted the "one person, one vote" rule which forces all congressional districts have nearly the same population. Gerrymandering hasn't been outlawed.
What provided constitutional justification for segregation for almost sixty years?
The Supreme Court ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson is what provided constitutional justification for segregation. Segregation in public schools was outlawed in another Supreme Court ruling in 1954.
What is the minimum number of Supreme Court Justices required?
Required for what? There are no constitutional mandates governing the number of justices seated on the Supreme Court; such details were left to Congress. Congress determined that a Judiciary Act should never allow fewer than six justices; the current legislation requires nine. A quorum of the current Supreme Court requires at least six justices to hear and decide a case.
Do US Supreme Court justices decide if laws are fair and reasonable?
Not really. The US Supreme Court is responsible for deciding if challenged laws conform to constitutional mandates. In an ideal world, all laws would be fair and just to everyone. In reality, laws may favor one group and feel unfair to another.
What is the leader of the supreme court called?
Chief Justice John Roberts.
Who outlawed the slave trade in Washington DC and included the Fugitive Slave Act that required all runaway slaves to be returned to their owners?
Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Law and the Supreme Court upheld it in the Dred Scott Decision.
What was the difference between Congress's 1964 action and the Supreme Court's 1954 action?
Congress's 1964 action refers to the passing of the Civil Rights Act, which aimed to end segregation and discrimination in public facilities, employment, and voting rights. The Supreme Court's 1954 action refers to the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, in which the Court declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. While both actions addressed racial inequality, Congress's 1964 action was a legislative effort while the Supreme Court's 1954 action was a judicial ruling.
What Supreme Court case most affected the Mormons by threatening a core belief of their religion?
Although I'm not sure if it's related to a US Supreme Court case, the LDS practice of polygamy essentially came to and end as a result of the US government persecuting LDS faithful for continuing to follow polygamy while the government outlawed the practice.
Can the Executive branch prosecute someone on a statute that the US Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional?
No. Once a statute is declared unconstitutional, it becomes unenforceable. Congress can rewrite the law to comply with constitutional mandates on the basis of the Supreme Court's decision, however, which they often do. So a person may be prosecuted under new or revised legislation that is substantially similar to the original legislation.
