It permits police officers to make an immediate search of the passenger compartment of an automobile incident to the arrest of an occupant or "recent occupant." It applies when officers do not initiate contact with the occupant until AFTER the occupant has voluntarily exited the vehicle and walked away from it.
Yes, in the absence of a male officer a female officer may pat down (for weapons) a male subject she has under arrest - then handcuff and secure him until the arrival of a male officer to conduct a more thorough body search. It is the same rule that applies when a male officer must search a female arrestee.
Belton's Rule states that the minimum distance between two peaks in a vibrational spectrum corresponds to the frequency of the lowest-energy normal mode in a molecule or crystal. It is useful in interpreting infrared and Raman spectra to identify the types of molecular vibrations present in a sample.
yes
It depends upon the Act's aplicability under which one have been booked. E.g under Information Technology Act 2008, Inspector can search and arrest without warrant any person found therein who is reasonably suspected of having committed or of committing or of being about to commit any offence under this Act
In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.
No, it was under British rule.
Unless there is some specific prohibition in your area, yes. In fact the idea that a male searches a male and a female searches a female is normally policy, not regulation. A small department may not have an officer of the 'correct' sex available when a search needs to be done, so whoever is available can perform the searches.
Denmark is under the rule of Denmark...
Yes. Malaysia was under british rule.
Hmmm....this looks exactly like the question posted for homework by my professor. Looks like somebody needs to think on their own and do their own homework. Just look up exclusionary rule. Also, this is an opinion question, so there really is no way to get an incorrect answer unless you can not support your theory.
The Fourth Amendment secures the rights of Americans to be secure in their person, property, or residence from unlawful search and seizure. If you are pulled over, the LEO can not search your vehicle without probable cause, unless they view something under the plain sight rule. If the LEO sees a pound of weed on the front seat, then they can search the vehicle. If there is nothing to give the officer probable cause, then they can not search without a warrant. If a Law Enforcement Officer intends to illegally search the vehicle. You may acknowledge, and state, that you believe it's an illegal search; however, do not resist in any way. If the search is truly illegal, the evidence they obtain will not be allowed in court. Resisting the search is a good way to cause harm to yourself, and you may be violating other laws in the process.
Search it up.