Wiki User
∙ 13y agoUtah was not a state but a territory. It did not raise any troops, though it was occupied by a Northern unit that felt mutinous because it was so far from the action.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoNew Mexico and Utah
Neither. Utah didn't become a state until 1896, which was over 30 years after slavery had been abolished.
Utah and New Mexico
Utah Nevada Dakota
California. (New Respondent) No, California was to be free - a major decision that needed a big gesture of appeasement for the South. This gesture was the Fugitive Slave Act that brought the civil war a long step closer. I'm not sure it admitted any new slave-states. I think it allowed for the states of Utah and New Mexico to be eligible for slavery under certain conditions when the time came.
No wars were fought in Utah in 1860.
The Mexican-War reignited the slavery question, as many of the acquired lands from Mexico became pro-slavery states territories. For example, Texas and New Mexico became pro-slavery while California and Utah didn't. Ultimately, this led to the American Civil War.
No, civil unions are banned and unrecognized in Utah.
Arizona is south of Utah
Arizona is south of Utah is which theme?
* Arizona * California * Nevada * Utah
No Idaho is North of Utah.
Idaho borders Nevada and Utah to the south.
No. Utah didn't become a state until after the civil war.
Under the 1850 Compromise, New Mexico and Utah were allowed in as slave-states, in exchange for California as free soil. After that, Kansas and Nebraska were to be admitted on a local vote on slavery ('Popular Sovereignty'). This resulted in bloodshed that foreshadowed the Civil War.
utah and mexico
Slavery would have been permitted in these territories. (Don't know if it happened.)