0
Utilitarians evaluate the morality of an act by examining the?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
consequences of the act.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can you use the word scoping?
yes, it is a proper wordscop·ing   [skoh-ping] Show IPAnoun1.Slang . the act or practice of eyeing or examining, as inorder to evaluate or appreciate.
According to utilitarians the right act is?
requires careful consideration of many factors and likely consequences.
Is morality subjective?
Yes it is for each moral act is preceded by a thought.
What is the act of examining your actions and motions too see whether or not you are acting responsibly?
Introspection
What are the disadvantages of believing something without examining it?
It may cause you to act on false information.
Frank dance model of communication?
"If communication is viewed as a process, we are forced to adapt our examinations and our examining instruments to the challenge of something in motion, something that is changing while we are in the very act of examining it."
What is the act of testing a hypothesis?
examining/ experimenting/ testing/ verifying... it depends on the type of hypothesis to an extent I think.
What are the basis of morality of human acts?
The basis of morality in a human action is well defined and prescribed in all religions and their scriptures. A person who is religious or believes in religion shall not commit an immoral act
Which word means seeing within oneself?
"Introspection" means the act of examining one's own thoughts and feelings.
When should you act on your own initiative to find clarify and evaluate information?
all the timr
What inspires people to act courageously?
what inspire people to act courageously is to get rewarded,help someone when they are in danger,or people like to act courageously
5 Why is it necessary to consider the intention of the doer in order to morally evaluate an act?
Simply that if the doer accidentally does a good deed while intending either something foul or even something of neutral moral value, then that act cannot be said to have been done with great moral principles. Conversely, if the doer mistakenlycommits a morally questionable faux pas then that act should not be taken as proof of a doubtful morality in the doer. (Although it could be used as an argument for the stupidity or cupidity of the doer!)
