answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Lochner v. New York, (1905) was a civil case that addressed the constitutionality of State labor laws, specifically the right of New York State to pass legislation setting the maximum number of work hours permitted bakers to 10 hours per day, or 60 hours per week. The Court held that the State had no legitimate interest in protecting the health of this class of worker because there were no substantial risks involved, and that the legislature had exceeded its authority under the state's police powers.

According to the Court, the restrictions were unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause because they violated the workers' liberty interest in freely contracting with the employer. While presented as a protection of the working class, Lochner-era decisions almost invariably favored industry over labor.

Case Citation:

Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45 (1905)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Lochner v. New York was not a criminal case. It was a civil case that involved a constitutional challenge to a state law regulating the working hours of bakers. The case focused on economic and due process rights rather than criminal wrongdoing.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Lochner v New York a civil or criminal case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is estafa a civil case?

It is a criminal case.


Was the case of Kramer vs Kramer an example of civil or criminal case?

Civil


Who are the parties in the landmark US Supreme Court case Lochner v. New York?

Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45 (1905)The parties were Joseph Lochner, a bakery owner who had been fined for violating state labor laws (petitioner/plaintiff), and People of the State of New York (respondent/defendant).For more information, see Related Questions, below.


How is jurisdiction decided for criminal cases?

Jurisdiction is decided for a criminal case based off of where the actual crime takes place. If a defendant is from New York, but commits a crime in Florida, Florida would have jurisdiction in the case.


Why would a insufficient check charge be dismissed in a civil case?

The question makes no sense. A "charge" refers to a criminal charge. A civil case refers to a case that is not criminal.


Is stealing a criminal case or civil?

theft is generally regarded as a criminal case but if the victim who was stolen from wishes to take action to recover the losses, then it will be a civil case as well


How do you use civil case in a sentence?

Unlike the arson case, which was a criminal case, Aaron's divorce action was a civil case.


What must be resolve first in a case is it the criminal aspect or the civil aspect?

If there are, in fact, both a criminal and a civil side to the incident, the criminal aspect will be handled first. The "state's" (i.e.: the "people's") interests in prosecuting a crime take precedence over the civil wrong against an individual. (Think the O.J. Simpson case.) Traditionally, the criminal matter will be decided first. This is primarily because proceeding with the civil case can prejudice a criminal defendant's rights. The civil case will wind up stalled because the criminal defendant can refuse to comply with civil discovery by asserting the right to remain silent. Admissions or statements given in a civil case could be employed against the criminal defendant. As a practical matter the civil case cannot proceed until there is a resolution of the criminal matter. For further information see the related links below.


Who bears onus of proof in criminal and civil cases?

In both cases, the moving party bears the burden of proof. In a criminal case, that is the government. In a civil case, that is the plaintiff.


Is drug dealing considered a criminal or a civil case?

Unless you are a registered pharmacist.


Was Roe v. Wade a civil or criminal case?

Roe v. Wade was a civil case; no crime was committed.


Criminal charges in a civil complaint?

There is no such thing as mixing civil and criminal actions in the same court action. If criminal charges arise as a result of a civil case action they will be charged and prosecuted seperately from the civil trial.