No.
Queensland was not a convict 'state' but it was established as a convict 'colony'. By the time Queensland became a state, it had long since stopped being a convict colony, or having any convicts.
No. James Cook was never a convict. It was upon his recommendation that New South Wales be settled as a convict colony.
The first convict colony in Australia was established in Port Jackson, New South Wales, with the arrival of the First Fleet on 26 January 1788.
it is anne hutchinson
The only remaining convict colony in Australia by the end of 1853 was Fremantle, in Western Australia.
South Australia is the only Australian state or colony with no history of convict settlement.
Britain first used the NSW colony as a convict colony, beginning in January 1788.
all except Georgia. it was considered a convict colony.
The first convict colony in Australia, established by the people of the First Fleet in 1788, was Sydney Cove, at Port Jackson. The settlement was given the name of Sydney Town, which was later shortened to just Sydney.
Ordinary doctors helped sick convicts. Occasionally, a colony's doctor might have taken on a convict as an apprentice, and upon gaining a conditional pardon, the convict might have chosen to continue in that profession.
She broke in to a warehouse and stole money and was sentenced to death.
South Australia, Western Australia (Swan River) and Victoria (Port Phillip) all did not start as convict colonies.While South Australia always remained convict-free, the settlers of the Swan River colony asked for convicts because they claimed there was the need for convict labour. The first convicts arrived about 15 years after the colony was founded.The Port Phillip District (Victoria) was established by free settlers who were joined by ex-convicts from Van Diemen's Land and New South Wales.