No there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction at the time of the invasion of Iraq . Iraq while in the grip of a dictator also posed less of a threat to the USA then say Saudi Arabia where allegedly the majority of 9/11 conspirators came from.
NO!
No
Yes, but the intervention was delayed for six months to get the necessary UN approval.
The premise for the war in Iraq was not one of humanitarianism. The justification for the war in Iraq was based on the belief that Iraq was associated with the terrorist strikes on 9-11 and that they were pursuing and creating weapons of mass destruction.Both claims were proven false after the fall of Iraq.
War is always undesirable and an evil. However, while there is no case that Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was justifiable, the Coalition forcing Iraq to get out of Kuwait may be justified.
The US's objective is to gain oil from Iraq.
Not really. Iraq exports alot of oil but due to the military action, Iraq suffered many terrorist attacks. Apart from the people being angry at the Americans for their intervention, Iraq's economy is quite good.
Andrew Carnegie objected to US intervention in Cuba.
Iraq and the US.
Justifiable is an adjective.
No, Iraq is not socialist. Iraq operates under a mixed economy system with elements of a market economy and state intervention. The government owns a number of key industries, but there is also room for private enterprise.
The people involved in the war in Iraq are the US, Iraq and the UK.