Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
No he did not fight in the Civil War
No it did not but in histroy it did.
It is likely that the Dred Scott decision had little direct effect on the Civil War. However, it is may be that the South felt more justified to pursue the war because of the decision.
the black side of evil
Dred Scott "Key"
dred scotts master was dr. john Emerson
i have no clue
Couldn't have had many... seeing as it he was a slave
No
Dred Scott was found guilty in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. This caused the African Americans to not be allowed to fight for freedom in court.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
eating food and picking up blows and getting laid in the corner
yes it did
dred scott attempted to leave the state he lived in which was a slave state and moved to a free slave so he can be "free" but slave is property and cannot be free ,
No he did not fight in the Civil War
First, the Dred Scott decision ruled that since Africans weren't citizens, they had no Constitutional rights. Second, it directly led to the Civil War and the abolition of slavery.