Slaves were property and had no relationship with an apprenticeship. The apprenticeship was a contract for 7 years of work in a area of trade.
slaves
The slaves and free people fought the system of slavery in riots, protests, boycotts, and acts of violence. They also fought against the south and slave owners until slaves were freed.
Abolitionists, who operated the system of safe-houses known as the Underground Railroad, to smuggle slaves to freedom in Canada.
Slaves as they were in those early years were not classified as people in the sense you and I might think of them. During the course of settling lands, moving selling slaves were property and had no value within the family system, only as a valued piece of the property that was being transported. Slaves were closer to being thought of as a tool or equipment.
This is a rather non-describing question. Seeing that throughout the history of man there have been slave holders and slaves in different nations under different sets of rule and sometimes there where revolts and sometimes not. The main reason however for slave revolts have been oppression of the holder. Slaves are humans seen as property gained often through acts of war. Slaves were not seen as human and often threated worse than animals held by the owner.* * I'm using past tense because the slave system where there were enough slaves to revolt at any given area is largely taken over by other names for oppression.
the slaves
Masters were not kind to their slaves due to a belief in the superiority of their own race, a desire to maintain control and power over others, and economic interests that benefited from the labor of enslaved individuals. This unjust and oppressive system allowed masters to exploit and mistreat their slaves without consequence.
slave codes
Slaves may have poisoned their masters as an act of rebellion against their oppressive conditions and to seek vengeance for the mistreatment they endured. Poisoning was a covert way for slaves to resist their enslavement and fight back against the system that oppressed them.
Quarreling with other slaves about their masters allowed slaves to vent frustration and assert their individuality and agency within a system designed to dehumanize and control them. It also served as a way to challenge power dynamics within the slave community and potentially build solidarity among themselves.
Apprentices were often unhappy with the conditions of the apprenticeship system because they were required to work long hours for low pay, had little control over their working conditions, and had limited opportunities for advancement or career growth. Additionally, some apprentices were subjected to abuse, exploitation, and poor treatment by their masters.
The conflicts between Douglass and Covey demonstrate how slavery dehumanizes both slaves and masters by perpetuating a system of violence, control, and degradation. Slavery strips away the humanity of slaves by treating them as property, while also dehumanizing masters by encouraging them to exert power and cruelty over others. This dynamic reinforces the inhumanity inherent in the institution of slavery.
Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.Not in the middle of August, but seriously, it was just as cold for the slaves as for the masters. The slaves had their cloaks and blankets for sleeping and if they were in an extremely cold climate, such as the mountains or maybe Britain, they had heavy clothing and braziers to heat their quarters if the hypocaust system did not reach there. No master or overseer wanted a bunch of sick slaves on their hands so they were reasonably well cared for.
No, the apprenticeship system came first before the amelioration proposal. The apprenticeship system was established in the early 19th century, whereas the amelioration proposals were introduced later as a means to improve working conditions for apprentices.
Bell. has written: 'An apprenticeship system'
An apprenticeship is basically a system of education that allows a person to work with an expert in the field in order to gain experience. This is usually an unpaid position.
The main clauses of the Emancipation Act of 1833 included the abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire, the granting of freedom to slaves, and the establishment of a system of apprenticeship to gradually transition former slaves to a state of full freedom. Additionally, the act provided for compensation to slave owners for their financial losses resulting from the emancipation of their slaves.