0
Was the chief justice who presided at the trail of dred Scott the slave who sued the?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What controversial topic did the Scott v Sanford case deal with?
Slavery. It was meant to be a simple verdict about whether a slave, Dred Scott, who had been taken on to free soil and then back into slave country, could sue for his freedom. The controversial part was the reason given for refusing Scott's request. The Chief Justice invoked the Constitution in the spirit in which the Founding Fathers would have written it. When they declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. To the Chief Justice, this meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
What was the Dred Scott v Stanford case all about?
The principle of 'once free, always free'. Dred Scott was the slave of an army doctor who was posted to free soil, where Scott could automatically have claimed his freedom. For some reason, Scott did not do this untl he was back in slave country. The local courts had never dealt with this situation before, and it ended up in the Supreme Court, where the Chief Justice alarmed the powerful Abolitionist lobby by invoking the Constitution - that a man's property is sacred, and slaves were property. This appeared to mean that no state could declare itself to be free soil.
Who was dred Scott and what was the dred Scott decision?
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
The decision in the Dred Scott case was that .?
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
How did the declaration of independence effect the American Civil War?
When denying freedom to the slave Dred Scott in 1857, the Chief Justice, Roger Taney, declared that signatories of the Declaration would have classified slaves as property, and that their ownership by their masters was sacred and inviolable. This verdict was highly controversial, driving the two sections further apart, and helped to stoke up the atmosphere for civil war.
Was the chief justice who presided at the trial of Fred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom?
I think you meant "Dred" Scott, not "Fred" Scott. And the answer was Chief Justice Roger Taney.
Was the chief justice who presided at trial of dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom?
john brown
Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?
john brown
Who was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom?
Roger Taney
Who was dred scoot?
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
What were the rulings of Chief Justice Taney in the Dred Scott v Sandford case?
The ruling was is that he was a slave and not a citizen couldn't sue for his release from slavery.
Who was the supreme court who handed down the decision that made Dred Scott remain a slave?
The Chief Justice was Roger Taney - ironically a one-time Abolitionist.
What was the ruling in the Scott v Sanford court case?
That the slave Scott could not have his freedom, because the Founding Fathers had declared that a man's property was sacred, and the Chief Justice reckoned that they would have included slaves in their definition of property.
What was the Dread Scott Decision?
The Chief Justice Roger B. Taney stated that any African/African American-slave or not-couldn't be a citizen of the U.S. and could not sue in the US courts.
What controversial topic did the Scott v Sanford case deal with?
Slavery. It was meant to be a simple verdict about whether a slave, Dred Scott, who had been taken on to free soil and then back into slave country, could sue for his freedom. The controversial part was the reason given for refusing Scott's request. The Chief Justice invoked the Constitution in the spirit in which the Founding Fathers would have written it. When they declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. To the Chief Justice, this meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
Why did the US Supreme Court deny Dred Scott his freedom?
The Dred Scott case of 1857 maintained the southern thinking that, as a slave, Dred Scott was no more than property. He was not entitled to citizenship, nor the right to sue.
Why wasn't Dred Scott free?
Dred Scott Was not Freed Because of the severe Racism and discrimination against slaves. Most slave owners did their best to make slaves miserable. this was not in scotts case though. He was also not freed because the chief justice that oversaw scotts hearing was Proslavery which completley put out scotts chances of being freed. Taney Decreed that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional, Scott was to stay a slave, Scott was not a U.S. citizen, and he could not sue BECAUSE he wasn't a U.S. citizen.
