True
false baby
false False
the answer is false.
false
False
false baby
It would be false to say the Navigation Acts were strictly enforced, as they were not. Americans were against the restrictions and smuggled the products they wanted.
Nope!!! The correct answer is........ FALSE!! QK (btw this is a ninja if u were wondering!!)
true
i think its true. nope its false
True. Defacto segregation laws, which were unofficial practices that enforced segregation, existed throughout the South. These laws were not written into the legal code but were still widely enforced through social norms and discrimination.
The fifth amendment protected people from the federal government. Due process rights were enforced to the states upon the approval of the 14th amendment.
The underlying assumption of this question, which is that constitutional monarchies are considered democracies by dint of being constitutional monarchies, is false. "Constitutional Monarchy" simply means that the power of the monarch (king) is limited by a constitution. This constitution can be enforced by some kind of oligarchy, aristocracy, or the common gentry. If the constitution is enforced by an oligarchy or aristocracy, the resulting state is not a democracy, whereas if it is enforced by the common gentry, it is democratic.Now, since almost all current constitutional monarchies are of this latter variety (monarchies with a constitution enforced by common people), people generally drop the intermediate step of separating non-democratic constitutional monarchies from democratic constitutional monarchies and refer to constitutional monarchies as a form of democracy.
No. The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, designed to protect society from corporate entities unfairly raising prices for consumers due to unfair competition. (Examples might include Andrew Carnegie, the Steel magnate who essentially could have set steel prices at any price he so chose, as there was no real competition to undercut his prices), was being applied to labor unions as organizations which were being said to unfairly raise the cost of labor, thus financially hurting the consumers. The Clayton Act of 1914 was passed, in part, to clarify that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce. Nothing contained in the antitrust laws shall be construed to forbid the existence and operations of labor [unions]... nor shall such organizations... be held or construed to be illegal combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade." An interesting fact to be considered, a provision of the Clayton act (poor wording) gave organizations the right to seek immediate injunctions to send striking/boycotting workers back to work. Prior to Clayton, the only way an injunction could be obtained was by a District Attorney. The Clayton Act could be argued to have been more damaging to labor unions than helpful!
False
False
False