Even US President Grant said that the Native American tribes were correct in resisting the "reservation system". He did, however, need to help expand US western growth. His orders to his generals in the West were to force Native Americans on to reservations. He believed this was a must in order to expand settlements and create farmlands and mines. Grant had no choice despite his ideas to avoid conflicts.
Bacon's rebellion was justified. He thought that the government was not protecting him and everyone else from the Powhatan's and also indentured servants were not getting the land they were promised in their contract as a servant for someone for a certain amount of years.
The Colonists felt that they were justified in refusing to obey certain British laws and officials. With the Stamp act, they were being taxed without having any say in the government that was taxing them. They also did not need the British soldiers telling them what to do, because they felt they were no longer British citizens.
The southern political thinker who justified southern resistance to the tariff of 1828 was?
Yes
They justified secession with the theory of states' rights.
indictment
The "White Eyes" were never justified in seizing the Creeks' Land or any Indian Nation Property and in fact, the United States broke over 900 Treaties with Native Americans, and treated them like animals for the most part, emasculating, and humiliating them. One terrible thing the Soldiers did was to round up all the Indians and force them onto "Reservations." This was a free roaming people, and a number of them simply sat down, and died because of it. Many starved, or died from exposure. There were Indian Agents who were corrupt and stole food and supplies that were intended for Native Americans in Reservations. Even today, the Native Americans on those Reservations, are still struggling to over come the events of the past.
100%
indictment; BRITISH
by being great
of course it was justified! The Egyptian people were mistreated and exploited by an insanley corrupt government.
to win freedom from great britain
It justified the reasons for changing government.
No, they were not concentration camps as the Germans built. They were Detention camps to keep the Japanese-American people under observation.
Its all relative on how you would consider justification. The 19th century Americans had the idea of Manifest Destiny, like it was there "Destiny" to expand westward and take over most of the continent. But, as you probably know, there were already people living there (natives.) The Native Americans were already pushed westward and put on reservations to try to "civilize" them. But once again, it is all relative.
no it was screwed up if you ask me :)
The French, British and Americans had different notions of the peace terms. So none were entirely justified. So really none then.