0
Were the exploits of Julius Caesar as a commander of Roman legions a benefit to the empire?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
The largest "exploit" of Julius Caesar and even the smaller ones all were a benefit to the Roman Empire. The conquest of Gaul was a stunning achievement and brought to Rome vast amounts of riches in terms of gold, taxes and slaves. Gaul was a large area to conquer. Although there would be a number of revolts by the Gauls over the centuries that it was part of the Roman empire, for the most part it was of extreme value to Rome.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who led the Roman army?
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
What was Julius Caesar's army called?
Julius Caesar's army had no particular name as a whole. A Roman army was simply called a Legion or a number of Legions. However all legions were numbered and sometimes granted a name if they were especially valiant. Caesar's Ninth and Tenth Legions were particularly famous.
What was the biggest mistake Augustus Caesar made?
the defeat of Roman legions in Teutoburg forest
How many legions did Caesar have?
When Caesar ignored the senate's order to disband his army and crossed the river Rubicon to march on Rome, he had one legion, the Legio XIII Gemina. His soldiers werebattlehardened veterans for his wars inGaul He then gathered more of his veterans. When he went to Hispania to fight the forces of the opposition there with 6 legions, 3,000 cavalry and his personal bodyguard of 900 cavalrymen. He took three legions to fight Pompey inGreece. When he went to fight opposition armies in Tunisia he had 10 legions. At the final battle of this civil war at Munda in Spain he had 8 legions. In each of thebattlesof this war,Caesar'stroops were outnumbered.
Who were the legates in rome?
In ancient Rome a legate was the military commander of a legion. He could loosely be compared to a general. However, the legate, himself, was many times under the command of a "Dux" who could loosely be compared to our five star generals. These were men such as Caesar or Pompey or Sulla who had overall command of several legions.
Who led the Roman army?
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
What did Julius Caesar live in?
Julius Caesar, being Pontifex Maximus, among his other titles, lived in a very luxurious house in Rome. When he was away on his military campaigns, his tents were also luxurious, befitting the commander of the legions.
Who invade Gaul?
Julius Caesar and his Roman Legions.
What was Julius Caesar's army called?
Julius Caesar's army had no particular name as a whole. A Roman army was simply called a Legion or a number of Legions. However all legions were numbered and sometimes granted a name if they were especially valiant. Caesar's Ninth and Tenth Legions were particularly famous.
Who was the Commander of the Roman army?
The Roman chain of command had some layers that may seem odd to us. Ultimately, during the republic, the senate was in command of the armies. Ultimately, during the principate, the ruling emperor was in command of the armies. However, if a governor of a province had legions stationed there, he was in command of them, even though each legion had a commander called a legate. For example, when the Senate authorized Julius Caesar to take five legions in Gaul, those legions were either newly recruited, or taken from another province. The commanders of the legions, the legates, would still be in command of their legion, but they, in turn, would take their orders from Caesar.
What happened to Cleopatra after ceaser died?
After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.After Caesar died, Cleopatra hurried back to Egypt to make sure her authority was secure. Nothing happened to her. She remained on the throne with the legions that Caesar had left there protecting her interests.
What was the biggest mistake Augustus Caesar made?
the defeat of Roman legions in Teutoburg forest
How many legions did Caesar have?
When Caesar ignored the senate's order to disband his army and crossed the river Rubicon to march on Rome, he had one legion, the Legio XIII Gemina. His soldiers werebattlehardened veterans for his wars inGaul He then gathered more of his veterans. When he went to Hispania to fight the forces of the opposition there with 6 legions, 3,000 cavalry and his personal bodyguard of 900 cavalrymen. He took three legions to fight Pompey inGreece. When he went to fight opposition armies in Tunisia he had 10 legions. At the final battle of this civil war at Munda in Spain he had 8 legions. In each of thebattlesof this war,Caesar'stroops were outnumbered.
Did Mark Antony Serve Caesar?
Yes, he was a loyal commander for Caesar in Gaul, and later became the Tribune in Rome at Caesar's request.
Which roman leader completed the conquest of Gual?
Julius Caesar. After that he became the first "imperator" (general of all legions)
What was the number of Roman legions that Augustus Caesar had to reduce as part of his Pax Romana?
The number of Roman legions under arms was over 66. Augustus needed to reduce this number and still provide protection to the empire.
Who were the legates in rome?
In ancient Rome a legate was the military commander of a legion. He could loosely be compared to a general. However, the legate, himself, was many times under the command of a "Dux" who could loosely be compared to our five star generals. These were men such as Caesar or Pompey or Sulla who had overall command of several legions.
