Yes there were several points prior to the Civil War, where reason could have defeated anger and fear.
Lincoln was a man of his word. Southern politicians did not accept the fact that Lincoln had no intentions of abolishing slavery in the South. In fact, Lincoln did not think slavery could be abolished unless there was a change in the US Constitution or individual States abolished it on their own.
Southern politicians were looking both short term & too far ahead.
Here is a summary which points out how the worst event in US History could have been avoided.
1. The South forgot that the compromise they made with anti slavery States in the beginning stages of the "Republic" was, that after 1808 no more new slaves could be brought into the USA.
2. This compromise was enforced. This being the case there had to be room for more compromises, but not the "Missouri type compromises". One such compromise could have been to slowly dissolve slavery in the North, Washington DC, the South and in the Territories on a timed gradual basis. Example:
2A. Every 5 years 10% of a slave holders slaves would be freed and the slaveholder compensated for losing "his assets"
2B. Slave owners could "cash in " at once and retain the former slaves as market priced labor wages.
3. Washington lawmakers could compromise (before the election of Lincoln) and pass a law forbidding new States to allow slavery as a condition of being admitted to the Union. The law would also legalise slavery in the South.
It needs to be remembered that slavery was legal when the Constitution was passed.
4. The split in the Democrat Party for the 1860 Presidential elections certainly was a factor of allowing Lincoln to win less than 40% of the popular vote yet have enough electoral votes to win. A Democrat victory would have created a less fearful South. With less fear we have room for more "reason" rather than chaos.
5.The State of South Carolina should have never assaulted Fort Sumter. This gave the North a tangible reason to have a war the common people in the USA did not want.
6. So looking short term placed fear in the minds of the power brokers in the South. These people also thought they saw a dismal future unless the left the Union. Not a good forecast. If they had thought about the above mentioned ideas or could see that history was making slavery obsolete, reason could have prevailed.
Yes there were several points prior to the Civil War, where reason could have defeated anger and fear.
Lincoln was a man of his word. Southern politicians did not accept the fact that Lincoln had no intentions of abolishing slavery in the South. In fact, Lincoln did not think slavery could be abolished unless there was a change in the US Constitution or individual States abolished it on their own.
Southern politicians were looking both short term & too far ahead.
Here is a summary which points out how the worst event in US History could have been avoided.
1. The South forgot that the compromise they made with anti slavery States in the beginning stages of the "Republic" was, that after 1808 no more new slaves could be brought into the USA.
2. This compromise was enforced. This being the case there had to be room for more compromises, but not the "Missouri type compromises". One such compromise could have been to slowly dissolve slavery in the North, Washington DC, the South and in the Territories on a timed gradual basis. Example:
2A. Every 5 years 10% of a slave holders slaves would be freed and the slaveholder compensated for losing "his assets"
2B. Slave owners could "cash in " at once and retain the former slaves as market priced labor wages.
3. Washington lawmakers could compromise (before the election of Lincoln) and pass a law forbidding new States to allow slavery as a condition of being admitted to the Union. The law would also legalise slavery in the South.
It needs to be remembered that slavery was legal when the Constitution was passed.
4. The split in the Democrat Party for the 1860 Presidential elections certainly was a factor of allowing Lincoln to win less than 40% of the popular vote yet have enough electoral votes to win. A Democrat victory would have created a less fearful South. With less fear we have room for more "reason" rather than chaos.
5.The State of South Carolina should have never assaulted Fort Sumter. This gave the North a tangible reason to have a war the common people in the USA did not want.
6. So looking short term placed fear in the minds of the power brokers in the South. These people also thought they saw a dismal future unless the left the Union. Not a good forecast. If they had thought about the above mentioned ideas or could see that history was making slavery obsolete, reason could have prevailed.
It is true that if the British had accepted the Olive Branch Petition then the Revolutionary War might have been averted. This petition was offered in 1775.
No. It could been averted if California had been divided into two states - North California (free) and South California (slave), meeting on the Missouri line. The Missouri Compromise could then have continued to keep the peace, as it had for thirty years.
imagine that there had been no blokage of the confederate coastline how might such a situation have influence of the civil war
Maybe WW2 could have been averted?
im not sure but during the 1950's Georgia might have been affected by racism in the civil war
The sinking of Titanic was caused by an innumerable amount of factors, many of them unavoidable, but arguably, if any of them were different the tragedy could have been averted. The results of the actual collision, for example, were a million-to-one. A million-to-one.
Relative civil quiet at a time (Jewish Passover) when civil unrest might have been expected.
Because it could have been averted. If California had been admitted to the Union as two states - North California and South California - the South would have been satisfied, and slavery would have died out anyway by about 1880, as European countries would increasingly have refused to trade with slave-owners.
Officers, cavalrymen, and artillerymen
U.S. Grant, for one. Might have been Longstreet too.
Slaves would have still been a big deal. The South would have been one nation.
the Civil War was a result of the secession of southern states, a president southern sympathies may have prevented the Civil War