answersLogoWhite

0

The main one was Hannibal Barca who invaded Italy for 15 years before being recalled to defend Carthage in North Africa.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who is a general who inflicted hevay losses on the British prior to the battle of Yorktown?

nathanael greene


Washingtons most trusted adviser who inflicted heavy losses on Cornwallis in North Carolina prior to the battle of Yorktown?

was natheal greene


Washington's trusted advisor who inflicted heavy losses on Cornwallis in NC?

Nathaniel Greene


How important were the losses of Carthaginian island?

The losses of Carthaginian islands, particularly during the First and Second Punic Wars, were crucial in diminishing Carthage's naval power and economic resources. The loss of Sicily, Sardinia, and Corsica weakened Carthage's strategic position in the Mediterranean, allowing Rome to expand its influence. These territorial losses also strained Carthaginian finances and military capabilities, ultimately contributing to the decline of Carthage as a dominant power. Overall, losing these islands marked a significant turning point in the balance of power in the ancient Mediterranean world.


What was the worst war for the Romans in the olden days?

The worst war for the Romans in ancient times is often considered the Second Punic War (218-201 BCE), particularly due to the military genius of Carthaginian general Hannibal. His audacious crossing of the Alps and subsequent victories, including the Battle of Cannae in 216 BCE, resulted in massive Roman losses and posed a significant threat to the Republic. The war strained Roman resources and morale, leading to significant military reforms and ultimately reshaping Rome's approach to warfare. Despite these challenges, Rome eventually triumphed, but the conflict left a lasting impact on its military and political landscape.


Why insurers exclude losses for self-inflicted injuries?

Insurers exclude losses for self-inflicted injuries to prevent moral hazard, where individuals might deliberately harm themselves to claim benefits. This exclusion helps maintain the integrity of the insurance system by discouraging fraudulent behavior. Additionally, self-inflicted injuries are often seen as a personal responsibility, making it difficult for insurers to assess risk and manage claims effectively. Ultimately, these exclusions help keep premiums more affordable for all policyholders.


Who was that famous general who's losses in battles were so great that he famously noted something like another victory like this will be the end of me?

Pyrrhus, a Greek king who championed the Greek resistance to the Romans in Southern Italy. Although Pyrrhus won too battles against the Romans, his losses were indeed high, and he is said to have made this prediction when congratulated on his second victory. Today, a victory at too high a cost is called a pyrrhic victory.


In general partnership if one partners actions cause the firm losses then?

all of the general partners suffer


Will an insured liability cover damages and injuries caused by an intentional criminal act?

It depends on what your saying. Was the intentional act, an act of the insured or was the insured the victim of a crime willfully caused by another. If you are the victim of a crime then your insurance may cover your losses. If so, your loss would not be covered under the liability portion of your own policy though, it would be covered under your comprehensive coverage. A person can not be liable to oneself. Losses and damages that arise from the Intentional acts, Criminal actions, Wanton negligence etc. of the insured are typically excluded from an insurance policy. Insurance is designed to cover unforeseen losses, accidental losses and catastrophic losses not willfully inflicted by the insured. Insurance would never be able affordable to anyone if it was expected to cover willfully inflicted losses of an insured.


Why was the battle of bunker hill technical victory for the British but a real victory?

It was for the British what is known as a pyrrhic victory - the losses inflicted were so great that it cost them more than what they gained from winning the battle.


How was the roman general Scorpio different from Hannibal?

Roman General Scipio and Hannibal differed significantly in their military strategies and backgrounds. Scipio, known for his adaptability and innovative tactics, famously defeated Hannibal at the Battle of Zama in 202 BCE, utilizing a combination of cavalry maneuvers and strategic positioning. In contrast, Hannibal was renowned for his bold and aggressive tactics, including the famous crossing of the Alps and his use of war elephants. While Scipio was a Roman statesman and general, Hannibal was a Carthaginian commander driven by a desire to avenge Carthage's losses in the First Punic War.


How important were the losses of Carthaginian island in the Mediterranean Sea to the carthaginians?

The loss of Carthaginian islands in the Mediterranean Sea was significant for Carthage, as these territories were crucial for trade and military control in the region. Losing these islands weakened Carthage’s naval power and disrupted its trade routes, which were vital for the economy. Additionally, the loss diminished Carthage's strategic foothold against rival powers, particularly Rome, ultimately contributing to its decline in influence and power during the Punic Wars.