A rooster's crow can harm a basilisk. All of the roosters were killed by ginny when she was being controlled by voldemort during The chamber of secrets for this reason.
There were several people petrified, but the only person to die from the basilisk was Moaning Myrtle. The fangs of the basilisk were used to destroy some of Voldemort's horcruxes.
He survived by three things: 1. Sometimes he gets lucky- e.g. Fawkes blinded the basilisk. 2. Lily Potter's protection runs through his veins so Voldermort cannot harm him. 3. He is a powerful wizard naturally
Harry potter's wand and lord voldemort's Wand share the same core so they can Only harm eachother
None of them. The only type of battle that happened at the Burrow was when the wedding was crashed but we later find out that most guests apparated and no harm was done to anybody since they were just looking for Harry.However, in the movie version of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince there is a battle at the Burrow which resulted in the house being set on fire. This did not happen in the book.
Professor Quirrell suffered severe burns and blisters when he touched Harry Potter. In the movie he began to crumble away. This is because Lily Potter sacrificed herself for her son and Lord Voldemort could not harm him. As Professor Quirrell was sharing his body with Voldemort, he too could not touch him.
No. It would be pointless to destroy the chamber, once the monster inside it was dead the chamber posed no harm. Besides, it was so deep under Hogwarts damage to the chamber would probably impact the structure of the building.
Arabella Figg is a squib who lives in Wisteria Walk in Little Whinging. She looked after Harry whenever the Dursley's went on vacation and was a witness in his trial during Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Before the fifth book Harry did not know of her magical background and was shocked to discover that not only did she know Dumbledore but that Dumbledore had asked her to keep an eye on Harry and ensure no harm came to him whilst he lived in Privet Drive.
She marries Ron Weasley and has two children, Rose and Hugo.
There are a number of things this question could mean. The character, Harry Potter, is not bad. Quite the opposite in fact, Harry Potter always fought for the good side. The books are not badly written and many people enjoy them. However this changes person to person as not everybody likes the same things. Once again, opinions on the movies differ from person to person as some people really enjoy them and other not so much. This question could also be asking if it is bad to read Harry Potter to which the answer is no. Some religious people are against the series as it promotes witchcraft but reading some books or watching some movies is not going to do you any harm.
to protect itself from creatures that could harm it.
Harry was reckless in the summer of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" by putting himself in dangerous situations such as spying on Draco Malfoy without a plan or backup, which could have resulted in serious harm. He also disobeyed orders from Dumbledore and pursued risky leads without considering the consequences.
I see no harm in visiting the farm. It is wise to stay out of the way of harm. Do not harm the residents. This sentence was created without harm to any living creatures.