Judicial restraint. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism.
For more information about the controversy over judicial activism and judicial restraint, see Related Questions, below.
If any law passed by the Congress is in violation of the Constitution, then the matter is put under the Judicial Review. This way the liberty and rights of the people are protected. This is guaranteed by the Constitution and no Congress can enact any low in violation of Constitution provisions.
Legal philosophy of judicial interpretation.
Judicial review is the power to declare a government action that violates some provisions of the constitution to be null and void. This is as a result of the action being in contravention with the provisions of the constitution.
impeach the president
The judicial branch sets the standards for naturalization and citizenship through the constitution. The judiciary will just play the role of interpreting the provisions by the constitution.
judicial
Strict constructionism is a judicial philosophy that interprets the Constitution based on its original intent and text, strictly adhering to the literal meaning of the words within it. Judges following this philosophy typically do not incorporate contemporary values or societal changes in their interpretations.
The Judicial Branch can veto bills passed by Congress, if they go against the Constitution.
The Judicial Branch can veto bills passed by Congress, if they go against the Constitution.
The Supreme Court which is part of Judicial Branch
The Constitution limits Congress's power in multiple ways. For instance, the President can veto legislature passed by the Congress, while the Judicial branch can overturn Congress's laws by ruling them unconstitutional.
The Constitution limits Congress's power in multiple ways. For instance, the President can veto legislature passed by the Congress, while the Judicial branch can overturn Congress's laws by ruling them unconstitutional.