Massachusetts and New York are about tied for being the state with the strictest gun control laws. In both of those states, one must have a permit just to own a handgun. However, Washington D.C., though not a state, has the strictest laws of all. They have an outright ban on handguns. You can have shotguns or rifles, but they have to be kept locked in a safe, without ammo. Also, they can't be semi-automatic.
No it is not because Georgia's constitution and laws have to apply to the state so our laws are made for the state only and we have a lot of different things that need to be put in check but the laws for the US are only minor laws so there are less :D
State child labor laws is less protective in New York. Also, the minimum wage is different in those 2 states.
because then the state legislatures have less power. this is because the people now had a voice to say what laws they wanted in or out
You can! But be careful of state laws that may require you to Switch over tags in thirty days or less.
true that's why public schools are cheap and private school invole alot of tuition
I Hypothesize that if we didn't have gun control laws, and the government handed guns to those who abide to the law, there would be less gun crimes, since the usual criminal only cares about himself.
A major exception is the public policy exception. Federal courts are less likely to force a state to enforce the laws of a second state where that law conflicts with the public policy of the first state.
More or less the same laws found in the US
Specific state laws should be consulted to find out exactly how long commercial property must be held in your state. Most states require less than a month.
'Acts' are laws passed by the state legislature (of US Congress) whereas "rules" are more-or-less administrative regulations that have the effect of law, but were not passed as statutes.
These generally sell for about a dollar.