Want this question answered?
The Age of Enlightenment was a movement of intellectuals in Europe. These individuals emphasized individualism and reasoning over traditions. The establishment of intellectual societies in America aided the spread of Enlightenment ideas.
the slaves would have been scared and unhealthy being stuck under a 2 feet gap and chained next to someone. some of the slaves died and lost their closest family. they were mistreated and if they did not do as they told they were either whipped severely or thrown over board and fed to the sharks.
they took it over because of of its minerals /natural reasources and also to gain wealth
Mark Antony repeatedly refers to Brutus as "an honorable man".
It is pure emotional fantasy. There is a problem in interpretation, however. I do not know where you obtained this quote from, but I think I have seen it or something similar to it in a political history discourse by someone famous. Here, we need a clarification as to whether you mean "Men" as generic human beings, or, "Men" as organized societies. Men as generic human beings truly are the providers, but whether we men are genuinely the "protectors" or not depends on a lot of factors. Often enough, we are more interferers with nature and destroyers of natural ecologies. Men as organized societies are usually war-mongering, conquering and destroying forces for our own egocentric aggrandizement. Not necessarily for "good", and usually not. Humans make things at the destructive expense of other life forms. We seldom hold ourselves to account for our destructiveness. For instance, we channel rivers and dam rivers so that when major rains occur, we create our own flooding disasters by interfering with nature! But we also mount military campaigns against other societies to steal what they have and to increase our area of influence! I think that we humans are more "interferors" than "providers". Everything we do disrupts something else, everything we do we ignore that for every action there is a corresponding reaction, and often negative! AND we humans are completely ignoring the fact that we humans are grossly over-populating "our" Earth at great expense not only to the existence of the ecological life forms but in that way to our own existence as well! Just remember Easter Island and how that civilization consumed itself to the point that now only 200 out of maybe 15,000 inhabitants now live there!
For the Europeans it was easier to take over the Americas because of their upper hand with immunity to diseases, and their superior weaponry.
Yes, during that time, white European writers held significant influence over the depiction of Africa and African cultures in literature. This often resulted in Eurocentric perspectives, stereotypes, and misrepresentations of African peoples and societies. This phenomenon overlooked the richness and diversity of African cultures and perpetuated harmful narratives.
[object Object]
A Well-defined infrastructure.
Their positive attitude and courageous sticktoitiveness
yes they know the land very well
Britain, it colonised most of the African countries
a well-defined infrastructure
A well-defined infrastructure.
The Europeans had military advantages such as superior weapons
advantage of forestryadvantage of forestry
In general, the societies were suppressed by the European's, over time resentment towards the colonial powers increased and either territories rebelled, or the colonial empire's ceded territories to economically dependent state's based of existing colonial border's which had yet another negative effect (see Nigeria)