The Book of Jericho documents Hebrew traditions about the military conquest of the land of the Canaanites under the leadership of Joshua. It is now several decades since archaeological evidence against the conquest of Jericho was first established. Since then, further evidence has accumulated that Joshua could not have conquered other cities described in the Book of Joshua. Archaeology has accumulated considerable evidence that the conquest did not take place as described in The Bible. Lawrence E. Stager (The Oxford History of the Biblical World, Forging an Identity: The Emergence of Ancient Israel) provides the following chart of cities mentioned in the account, with no evidence of a Joshua's invasion of Canaan.
* Site not known/ occupation not known
a) Not occupied/ meagre occupation
b) No destruction/ destruction not likely by Israelites
c) Contrary evidence
d) Possible destruction by Israelites
Jericho - Joshua 12:9; 6; 24:11
a) Meagre LB II occupation
Ai - Joshua 12:9; 7:2-8:29
a) No occupation from 2250 to 1200
Jerusalem - Joshua 12:10; Judges 1:21
b) No destruction at the end of LB II
Hebron - Joshua 12:10; 10:3637; 14:13-15; 15:13-14; Judges 1:10
b) No evidence
Jarmuth - Joshua 12:11; 10:5
b) LB II to Iron I occupation
Lachish - Joshua 1211; 10:31-32
c) City VII destroyed in late thirteenth century
Clty VI destroyed c. ll50.
Eglon - Joshua 12:12; 10:34-35
* Tell 'Aitun; LB occupation unclear
Gezer - Joshua 12:12; contra Judges 1:29
d) LB destruction, probably by Merneptah or Philistines
Debir - Joshua 12:13; 10:38-39; 15:15-17; Judges 1. 11-13
b) Tell er-Rabud; no destruction at end of LB
Geder - Joshua 12:13
* Khirbet Jedur; LB II and Iron I pottery; not excavated
Hormah - Joshua 12:.14
* Identification unknown
Arad - Joshua 12:14
a) No LB occupation
Libnah - Joshua 12:15; 10:29-31
* Identification unknown
Adullam - Joshua 12:1
* Khirbet 'Adullam;
not excavated
Makkedah - Joshua 12:.16; 10:28
* Identification unknown
Bethel - Joshua 12:16; 8:17; Judges 1:22-26
d) Destruction in late thirteenth century
Tappuah - Joshua 12:17
* Tell Sheikh Abu Zarad; not excavated
Hepher - Joshua 12:17
* Tell el-Muhaffer;
not excavated
Aphek - Joshua 12:18
c) LB destruction followed by Iron I "Sea Peoples" occupation
Lasharon - Joshua 12:18
* Identification unknown
Madon - Joshua 12:1
* Identification unknown
Hazor - Joshua 12:19; 11:10-13; Judges 4:2
d) LB city, Stratum XIII destroyed in thirteenth century
Shimron-meron - Joshua 12:20
* Identification unknown
Achsaph - Joshua 12:20
Khirbet el-Harbaj: LB II and Iron I pottery
Taanach - Joshua 12:21; contra Judges 1:27
a) Meagre LB II remains; Iron I village destroyed in latter half of twelfth century
Megiddo - Joshua 12:21; contra Judges 1:27
b) LB II/Iron I city, Stratum VIIA destroyed in latter half of twelfth century
Kedesh - Joshua 12:22
b) Tell Abu Qudeis; Iron I settlement, Stratum VIII destroyed in latter half of twelfth century
Jokneam - Joshua 12.22
c) LB II settlement, Stratum XIX destroyed in late thirteenth or twelfth century; gap follows
Dor - Joshua 12:23; contra Judges 1:27
c) 'Sea Peoples' known as Sikils occupy city in twelfth century;
transition from LB to Iron I not yet determined
Goiim - Joshua 12:23
* Identification unknown
Tirzah - Joshua 12:24
b) Tell el-Farah (N); LB II and Iron I occupation; no evidence of destruction.
Yes, "Joshua's Gold" is a work of historical fiction. It is a story that incorporates fictionalized elements within a historical setting to create a narrative that is based on historical events or time periods.
They are the 12 historical books.
The Book of Joshua describes how Joshua led the Israelites across the River Jordan and conquered the entire land of the Canaanites. Whether Joshua is historical depends first of all on whether that conquest is verified as historical, and it fails this first test. In the last quarter of a century, archaeological evidence has been the prime factor in finally disproving the conquest of the Canaanites, in addition to critical study of the biblical texts.The conquest model described in the Bible had strong support among historians and scholars until around the middle part of the twentieth century, but has since been all but abandoned by mainstream scholars and continues to be pressed by only a few conservative scholars (Lester L Grabbe, Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It?, P102).
If I understand what you mean by "section", Joshua is considered one of the "historical" books (as opposed to "poetry", "prophets", or the Pentateuch).
portraits of national heroes
The book of Joshua is a historical narrative within the Old Testament of the Bible. It recounts the story of the Israelites' conquest of the Promised Land under Joshua's leadership after the death of Moses.
Joshua Judges Samuel Kings Daniel Ezra Nehemiah Chronicles
The scripture verse where you can find information about the 12 stones taken our of the Jordan is in the book of Joshua in the old testament. See Joshua 4:19-24. That is the fourth chapter of Joshua verses 19 to 24. To get the historical background of this scripture read the entire book of Joshua.
Joshua N. Fletcher has written: 'Archaeological data recovery at 38CH1292, Charleston County, South Carolina' -- subject(s): Antiquities, Design and construction, Excavations (Archaeology), Indians of North America, Local History, Roads, Salvage archaeology
The account of the fall of Jericho in Joshua 6 conflicts with archaeological evidence because there is no evidence of a destruction layer at Jericho that aligns with the biblical account. Additionally, the timeline provided in Joshua for the conquest of Jericho does not match with historical dates. The Jericho that existed at the time the Israelites would have entered Canaan was actually a smaller settlement.
The book of prophecy among the options provided is Nahum. Nahum is one of the Minor Prophets in the Old Testament and contains prophetic messages about the impending destruction of Nineveh. Joshua, Nehemiah, and Ezra are historical and leadership books in the Old Testament.
Saint Joshua is not a widely recognized figure in Christian tradition. There is limited historical information available about him, and he is not mentioned in the Bible. It is possible that there may be local or regional traditions regarding Saint Joshua in certain places, but there is no widely known story or account of his life or deeds.