The facts case is where you end up fighting Sullivan.
Facts relevant or pertinant to a case
The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar was created in 1845-12.
I take it literally mean "in this case." I.e., from the facts about the particular case.
If a previous case is properly and convincingly distinguished on the facts, the ruling in that case may be inapposite.
Means all the facts in the case were heard before the case was dismissed.
This is the argument of a case rather than the hard facts of a case
multiplication facts are simply that times table in this case 5
I got all this facts from this nonfiction book.
No.
If you haven't gone to trial yet, contact your attorney, or file a motion with court, to correct the record, or present testimony that will disprove the incorrect facts. If the case is already over and has already been adjudicated - if the corrected facts have a bearing on the outcome of the case, your only recourse is to file an appeal of your case with the next higher court.
Clayton's case in banking law refers to the U.S. Supreme Court case of Bank of United States v. Thayer, decided in 1819. In this case, the court affirmed congressional power to charter a national bank under the necessary and proper clause of the Constitution. The decision had significant implications for the balance of power between state and federal government in regulating banking.