Both use the world around us as evidence. Both use extrapolation. Both point to the necessary existence of a Divine Being (God). Both are based upon logic and/or faith. The cosmological argument states that everything must have a source, a creator or a cause, and concludes that the First Cause was (is) God, who got everything started. The teleological argument states that the detailed design which we witness in the universe (especially in living things), is evidence of God's existence. For example, theoretical physicist and popular science writer Paul Davies (whose early writings were not especially sympathetic to theism) states concerning the fundamental structure of the universe, "the impression of design is overwhelming" (Davies, 1988, p. 203). The two arguments are ancient. They were discussed by the classical Greek philosophers, but are stated still earlier in the Hebrew Bible, in passages such as Psalm 19 and Job 36:22 to 37:24. See also the Related Links.
Both use the world around us as evidence. Both use extrapolation.
Both point to the necessary existence of a Divine Being (God).
Both are based upon logic and/or faith.
Cosmological theory is a scientific theory . (It should be noted that a scientific theory differs greatly from common notions of what a theory is) . A cosmological theory takes scientific facts, raw data, evidence & logical argumentation & organizes it as an explanation of the cosmos ... The "argument" is purely philosophical in nature. It's origins are widely attributed a Muslim named Kalam in the Middle Ages. It sought to use the workings of the cosmos as a proof for the existence of a god. It positions a god as a kind of "first mover". However; the argument is weak & has been refuted on many levels. It's based on a misunderstanding of "cause & effect".
discuss briefly the similarities and differences between strong and weak arguments and cogent and uncogent argument support your discussion with your own examples
what are the similarities between basketball and ring-ball
You could make an argument for the differences between them while yet they do have similarities. Both would be against homosexual marriages unlike liberals.
what is the similarities between the ulna and the radius
Corroboration is the ability to compare information provided by two separate sources and find similarities between them. ... Finding corroboration between sources strengthens your conclusions, especially when you are making a historical argument.
similarities
What are the similarities between cheek and onion cells?"
what are the similarities between network switch and a hub
There are zero similarities between the two.
similarities between kangaroo and human
There are zero similarities between the two.