Windows is an example of a non-realtime OS.
The short answer is that a real time OS has a very short (in real-time) and predictable latency response to interrupts and/or task thread switching when compared a standard computer or PC OS. A dedicated RT OS, meaning it performs more specific and/or limited functions can have a ten-fold decrease in the number of clock cycles or task switch times when compared to a traditional OS.
Real time system
yes
Microsoft
Palm OS is generally not considered a real-time operating system. True real-time operating systems are multi-tasking; the "real-time" refers to the ability to effectively manage resources to achieve a result in as little time as possible. Palm OS is single-tasking, so the speed at which it performs is mostly bottlenecked by the individual application running. Windows CE is a real-time operating system; most uses of it are in multi-tasking devices. Linux is not necessarily a real-time operating system, but can be configured that way, depending on the scheduler selected.
real time os is most imp bcz there is lot of need for the applicaion on os bt bcz of time & correctness the o/p is not so goo. using rtos we cn create the crrct output for ahe application
Jean J. Labrosse has written: '[Mu]C/OS' -- subject(s): MuC/OS, Real-time control
Classification of Advanced OS is done as below:Architecture driven systems, and Application driven system. 1. Architecture driven: * Network OS * Distributed OS * Multiprocessor OS 2. Application driven: * Database OS * Real Time OS * Multimedia OS
Hospital Real de Todos os Santos was created in 1504.
No a RTOS is used only for real time applications and does not have many needed feature of a normal OS.
os is an operating system.if the os is not they it is non-bootable configuration.
Real time introduce for correct operation, and it required to produce a result within a non-negotiable time period.