Ontological assumptions refer to the beliefs about the nature of reality, existence, and being. These assumptions shape how individuals perceive and interpret the world around them, influencing their understanding of what is true, real, and valid. They are fundamental in guiding philosophical and scientific inquiries.
The first philosopher to propose an ontological argument is generally attributed to St. Anselm, an 11th-century Christian theologian and philosopher. He argued that the very concept of God as the greatest possible being necessitates His existence.
Assumptions can fall into two categories: explicit assumptions, which are consciously stated or believed, and implicit assumptions, which are subconscious beliefs taken for granted. Explicit assumptions are those that are openly expressed and acknowledged, while implicit assumptions are underlying beliefs that may not be overtly stated but still influence thoughts and actions.
The ontological argument is typically considered a deductive argument. It aims to establish the existence of God by reason alone, starting from the concept of God as a necessary being. It proceeds through logical steps to demonstrate that God's existence is a necessary consequence of His definition.
The two categories of assumptions in critical thinking are explicit assumptions, which are openly stated, and implicit assumptions, which are not directly stated but can be inferred from the context or background knowledge. Explicit assumptions are easier to identify and challenge, while implicit assumptions require deeper analysis to uncover their impact on reasoning.
Assumptions are beliefs we accept as true without evidence. In critical thinking, it is important to recognize and question assumptions because they can affect our reasoning and conclusions. By examining and challenging assumptions, critical thinkers can develop more informed and rational perspectives.
There are many options for books on ontological arguments at Amazon, including The Many-Faced Argument: Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. Barnes and Noble and Borders also offer a selection.
The ontological argument is typically considered a deductive argument. It aims to establish the existence of God by reason alone, starting from the concept of God as a necessary being. It proceeds through logical steps to demonstrate that God's existence is a necessary consequence of His definition.
•Phenomenological-a person's experiences and interpretations of themselves and of the world around them are as real as the 'reality' from which they are derived•Focus on the existing person-May 'existentialism means centering upon the existing person'•Ontological - nature of being-'what is it like to be this person in the world'
The ontological argument of the exsitance of god is supported by abrahmic religions. It is not widely practiced in the current day.
R. T. Allen has written: 'The necessity of God' -- subject(s): God, Ontological Proof, Proof, Ontological
Kate Davy has written: 'Richard Foreman and the Ontological-Hysteric Theatre' -- subject(s): Ontological-Hysteric Theatre, Stage history
An ontological metaphor is a metaphor that characterises a non-physical object as a physical entity.eg. "It will take a lot of patience to finish this book" Patience in this case is treated as a quantity.
Adjective formed from the noun ontology.
The Ontological Argument
That would be Anselm of Cantebury!
Personification is an ontological metaphorin which a thing or abstraction is represented as a person.[
It is a philosophical argument that God exists. While many philosopher's theories had many differences in derivation and reasoning, the conclusion to all ontological arguments was that the superior being of God is a reality.