WWE because it has more talent more spectators more entertaining better superstars worldwide exciting events nice segments more hall of famers better titles . TNA sucks it takes ex WWE superstars no entertainment so if they want ex WWE superstars that proves WWE is way better
Tna! Tna! Tna!
i think he does like wwe better than tna. but it's kind of like an opinion. But In my opinion Jeff Hardy like wwe better than tna
WWE Is Better . . .
to get more days off because you get more days off in TNA then WWE but WWE is alot better
wwe because they have more wresler and tna have 20 12 something like that
WWEWWE is better than tna because in wwe they got entertainment and wrestling and stoylines and they don't talk much but only twice and get to the wrestling the rest of the show and in tna all they do is talk and have about 3 matches that are short who wants to see that wwe does alot better at what they do since the wrestlers train and practice promos for 3 years and tna never did that so u guys that think tna is better that's your opion just don't have to say nothing about the wwe. To me wwe is better okay that's in my opion so don't get mad and in my opion tna sucks sorry guys im just telling you the truth about wwe and tna.
I've never heard of roh, but probably the WWE over TNA. As for the UFC, it's not even in the same category. It is mixed martial arts. well wwe might get better rating but people on tna are better and tna is sky rocketing
Don't know better question is who from TNA will be going to WWE
WWE is World Wrestling Entertainment, (Smackdown! and Raw) which has been around for 50 years or so. TNA is a newish wrestling company where many wrestlers kicked out of WWE go to. TNA tries to compete with WWE (they're rivals) but WWE has more experience and therefore has better business then TNA.
depends how u look at them Tna is more extreme now that wwe is in the pg era but the wwe superstars could probably kick tna's asses Tna is way better then WWE. TNA has better tag team wrestling, better variations of mathes and more skilled superstars (apart frome stone cold, Terry Funk and Shawn Micheals of course) WWE has better pay per views though, Wrestlemania and royal rumble have good matches and good title stops. There are no point to TNA pay per views. The wrestlers In tna have good skills and good qualities. They take all the new guys and turn them into ledgends. Then they take the ledgends from wwe and make them better like Mick Foley and Sabu and Rhino and Stevie Richards.
In tna Jeff hardy is a bad and mean person but in wwe Jeff hardy is a good and nice person in tna people boo Jeff hardy in wwe people cheer for Jeff hardy tna stinks wwe rocks wwe is way better than tna a million times better wwe forever
It is a possibility that WWE will invade TNA. If it does happen, it is unknown.
tna is a wrestling show but it will never in eversville be better than wwe