depends how u look at them Tna is more extreme now that wwe is in the pg era but the wwe superstars could probably kick tna's asses
Tna is way better then WWE.
TNA has better tag team Wrestling, better variations of mathes and more skilled superstars (apart frome stone cold, Terry Funk and Shawn Micheals of course)
WWE has better pay per views though, Wrestlemania and royal rumble have good matches and good title stops. There are no point to TNA pay per views.
The wrestlers In tna have good skills and good qualities. They take all the new guys and turn them into ledgends. Then they take the ledgends from wwe and make them better like Mick Foley and Sabu and Rhino and Stevie Richards.
Tna has superstars from wwe who lest like ric flir RVD and Tommy dremmer
But wwe has still got good superstars like the miz John Cena and undertaker
A WWE is Better Than TNA yes
i think he does like wwe better than tna. but it's kind of like an opinion. But In my opinion Jeff Hardy like wwe better than tna
tna is a wrestling show but it will never in eversville be better than wwe
WWE because it has more talent more spectators more entertaining better superstars worldwide exciting events nice segments more hall of famers better titles . TNA sucks it takes ex WWE superstars no entertainment so if they want ex WWE superstars that proves WWE is way better
WWE Is Better . . .
WWEWWE is better than tna because in wwe they got entertainment and wrestling and stoylines and they don't talk much but only twice and get to the wrestling the rest of the show and in tna all they do is talk and have about 3 matches that are short who wants to see that wwe does alot better at what they do since the wrestlers train and practice promos for 3 years and tna never did that so u guys that think tna is better that's your opion just don't have to say nothing about the wwe. To me wwe is better okay that's in my opion so don't get mad and in my opion tna sucks sorry guys im just telling you the truth about wwe and tna.
Because WWE has been around longer than TNA
no don t get me wrong i love tna but wwe is much richer and could buy out tna easer than tna could buy wwe. wwe is trying to buy tna now tna trying to buy wwe is impossible.
Yes,tna stands for total non stop action...it has six sided ring ,,,,different from wwe.sooo,,,if you get boared of wwe....i will surely recommend tna......which is lot more better than wwe...
In tna Jeff hardy is a bad and mean person but in wwe Jeff hardy is a good and nice person in tna people boo Jeff hardy in wwe people cheer for Jeff hardy tna stinks wwe rocks wwe is way better than tna a million times better wwe forever
As of now, WWE is much better because they have better wrestlers like Undertaker, Triple H, John Cena, Randy Orton, Edge, Rey Mysterio, and Batista. Most of TNA's best wrestlers are former WWE wrestlers like Kevin Nash, Scott Hall, Jeff Hardy, Rob Van Dam, Kurt Angle, Team 3D, Hulk Hogan, and Ric Flair. Also WWE has 4 shows plus PPVs and TNA is showed once a week plus PPVs. WWE has more money than TNA and TNA is only 6 years old as WWE has been here for a long time. In the future I predict that TNA will become better than WWE due to TNA on Monday's conflicting with WWE Monday Night RAW. If TNA wishes to become better they should be shown twice a week, and get more original wrestlers rather than taking from WWE.
TNA wrestling can be real but its practically fake. Same with WWE.
to get more days off because you get more days off in TNA then WWE but WWE is alot better