Shakespeare was co-owner of The Lord Chamberlain's Men which briefly became Lord Hunsdon's Men when their original patron died, but his son was also made Lord Chamberlain and so they resumed the first name. in 160, it became the King's Men. the company had three names, but it was only one company.
A charter. He himself was the patron of the company. All acting companies at the time had to have a noble patron by law. This was to prevent vagabonds and conmen from pretending to be acting companies.
Playwrights sold their scripts to acting companies who then had the exclusive rights to perform them. Since the companies had bought and paid for the scripts, the scripts were their property to do with as they would. The playwright had no further interest in them.
120
it was the globe theatre
None. It was against the law for women to act in this time in history.
A charter. He himself was the patron of the company. All acting companies at the time had to have a noble patron by law. This was to prevent vagabonds and conmen from pretending to be acting companies.
The Lord Chamberlain's Men was one of the leading acting companies of its day.
Playwrights sold their scripts to acting companies who then had the exclusive rights to perform them. Since the companies had bought and paid for the scripts, the scripts were their property to do with as they would. The playwright had no further interest in them.
120
it was the globe theatre
They may have had water, wine, ale, or rum; the same as the audience.
None. It was against the law for women to act in this time in history.
none because his plays sucked
Shakespeare's occupations were Writing plays, sonnets and acting.
Shakespeare's acting company was first known as Lord Chamberlain's Men. The name was changed to The Kings Men in 1603 when King James I ascended the throne and became the company's patron.
Macbeth
3:pm