0
In other foreign countries they have tougher punishments that we view as "cruel." Yet people are a lot more likely not to steal if they know they are going to lose a hand for doing it. Having a hand, foot or ear chopped off is mutilation and falls fairly and squarely under the heading of 'cruel and unusual punishments' which are expressly banned by the American constitution. In Britain, too, mutilation would be contrary to the English Bill of Rights (1689) and its Scottish counterpart. 'Corporal punishment' generally denotes birching, whipping, caning, etc. IF it were a patent solution to crime that would have become obvious ages ago. On the contrary, in the days when judicial whippings were used in Britain, some people showed off their marks, for example, to other gang members ... In some circles it became a kind of badge of honour, a rite of passage, a visible sign that one had 'graduated' into the world of adult crime and so on. The notion that the whip works wonders is bizarre.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
For: Some argue that corporal punishment can be an effective form of discipline to modify behavior, teach respect, and establish boundaries. It is seen as a quick and immediate consequence that can help shape behavior.
Against: Many argue that corporal punishment can lead to negative consequences such as increased aggression, mental health issues, and strained parent-child relationships. It can also teach children that violence is an acceptable way to solve problems.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did all schools use corporal punishment in 1968?
No, not all schools used corporal punishment in 1968. While corporal punishment was more common in schools during that time compared to today, its usage varied widely by location and individual school policies.
When were corporal punishment in schools allowed?
Corporal punishment in schools has been allowed at various points in history and is still permitted in some places today. In the United States, it was commonly used until the late 20th century when many states began banning it. Other countries, like parts of Africa and Asia, still allow corporal punishment in schools.
Is corporal punishment legal in japan?
Corporal punishment is not prohibited by law in Japan, but it is generally frowned upon in educational settings. Schools have guidelines on disciplinary measures, which discourage physical punishment. However, it is not explicitly banned, so it can vary depending on the school's policies.
Why corporal punishment should not be abolished?
Corporal punishment should not be abolished because it can be an effective deterrent to undesirable behavior, instilling discipline and respect in individuals. In some cases, it may be the most effective way to address serious behavioral issues and maintain order. Additionally, it can serve as a form of punishment that holds individuals accountable for their actions.
What is the definition of corporal punishment?
Corporal punishment is a form of discipline that involves physically inflicting pain or discomfort on a person as a form of punishment. This can include hitting, spanking, or any other physical act intended to cause pain. It is often used as a disciplinary measure, especially in some educational or domestic settings, but its effectiveness and ethical implications are widely debated.
When was corporal punishment banned in the Bahamas?
Corporal Punishment was never completely banned. It is however banned in schools to some extent, only principals and the administrators are allowed to use corporal punishment in the schools. Teachers are forbidden to do so.
When did the belt get abolished at school?
Different countries made legislation against corporal punishment at various times. Some still allow it.
How can the evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives explain the use of corporal punishment on children?
Corporal punishment for children has been used for thousands of years. Some cultures use corporal punishment more than other cultures because that's how they developed over time. Corporal punishment is diminishing in many cultures because people are starting to realize that teaching children works better and does less damage.
How can corporal punishment damage a child psychologically?
Corporal punishment can result in anxiety disorders and depression and low self esteem in children who are subjected to it. These disorders can continue into later life. Some experts also say that corporal punishment can affect children psychosexually, especially when applied to the buttocks in the form of spanking or paddling.
What are some advantages of corporal punishment in the development of a child?
You give them a silent treat ment
Which countries still use corporal punishment in schools?
There are a number of countries which still use corporal punishment in schools. Some of them include Malaysia, Costa Rica, India, Pakistan, Philippines and so many others.
Arguments against endangered species?
try doing some reseach on arguments against it then reverse it
Did all schools use corporal punishment in 1968?
No, not all schools used corporal punishment in 1968. While corporal punishment was more common in schools during that time compared to today, its usage varied widely by location and individual school policies.
Is corporal punishment legal in japan?
Corporal punishment is not prohibited by law in Japan, but it is generally frowned upon in educational settings. Schools have guidelines on disciplinary measures, which discourage physical punishment. However, it is not explicitly banned, so it can vary depending on the school's policies.
Is corporal punishment a justifiable method of punishing adult criminals?
As far as I'm concerned, that's a matter of opinion, not fact. Some will tell you that corporal punishment (or capital punishment as it's sometimes known as) is a perfectly acceptable form of punishment and that often times it is used to make the punishment fit the crime as in the case of murder. However, some believe that capital punishment is wrong and that just because one person caused another person pain, they deserve forgiveness rather than the same punishment in return. There is also the argument for rehabilitation as opposed to pain. Often times the prospect of spending many years in prison will deter a person far more than just corporal punishment alone. I'm afraid this is the best answer I can give you. Again, this topic is based entirely in opinion, not in fact. No one can truly say they have the correct answer to weather corporal punishment is justifiable. I believe that Corporal Punishment is right if it fits the crime. It's not to get back at the person who did the evil deed, but it is a noted fact by stats that most criminals (murder, rape, etc.) get right back out on the street and do it all over again. How often have we seen people leave prison over and over and re offend ... plenty! Then the public end up howling like a pack of wolves and asking the question, "Why was he released?" The prisons are over-flowing and, if without a doubt the criminal has committed a crime that requires Corporal Punishment then this is the way it should be done. I do believe executions should be carried out in a humane method or otherwise we become no better than they are. There seems to be some confusion in the terms, corporal punishment is the act of punishing or disciplining someone by physical means. Capital punishment is another term used for the death penalty. Having said that, my answer would be an unequivocal, NO! for too many reasons to go into here. Mackey is absolutely correct and I did make a mistake. I don't believe in torture of another human being and each country has it's own was of corporal punishment (so I have found out.) At one time (even today) spanking children is under the heading of corporal punishment and I say yes if it's the last resort and that means a spanking on the butt without the use of anything but the palm of one's hand. From Canadian Law (Also American in many States): Such debates, however, do not always lead to the banning of domestic corporal punishment and The Supreme Court of Canada recently reaffirmed the right of a parent or guardian to use corporal punishment on children between the ages of two and twelve; this decision was contentious, being based upon S.43 of the Canadian Criminal Code, a provision enacted in 1892. [3] Similarly, despite some opposition to corporal punishment in the USA, spanking children is legal, with some states explicitly allowing it in their law and 22 US states allowing its use in public schools. A ban has been proposed in Massachusetts, on all corporal punishment of children, including by parents, and a series of laws in Minnesota severely restrict the use of corporal punishment of children.
What are some arguments against selling organs?
It is possible that you may die.
When was corporal punishment introduced?
This varies from state to state, and whether or not the school is a state school or a private school.Legislation to ban corporal punishment in all state schools was introduced in New South Wales in 1990, and this extended to private schools in 1997.It was banned in the ACT in 1997, and although the legislation states it is banned in "all schools", it does not explicitly include private schools.Tasmania banned corporal punishment in both public and private schools in 1999.Victoria first banned corporal punishment in public schools in 1989, and this extended to non-government schools in 2006.Queensland banned corporal punishment in state schools in 1995, but it is still legal in private schools.Corporal punishment in government schools in South Australia ended in 1991, but there are still moves to ban it in non-government schools. Interestingly, the legislation covering corporal punishment in both SA and Qld state schools is not actually legally binding, according to a paper published in May 2010.Western Australia abolished corporal punishment in state schools in 1999, but this does not extend to students in private schools.Corporal punishment is not explicitly banned in the Northern Territory, but there are moves in this direction.
