The line-item veto gives the President more power. Without it, Congress can bundle expenditures the President would like to veto with items that are absolute necessities and so force the President to allow something he does not want. Whether this is bad or good would depend on the wisdom of the President.
Line-item veto
The line item veto has little chance of passing.
The line item veto is used only in budget bills
Yes, because the line-item veto is the power of the Texas governor to reject only some provisions of a spending bill.
The line item veto is used only in budget bills
I know for a fact that California has "line-item" veto. Not sure if that's the same thing as item veto. Hope this helps : )
ho- the US president does not have a line-item veto. He must either veto the whole bill or let it go either with his signature or not.
When a Governer approves parts of a bill and vetos others, it is called using a "line item veto."
The 104th Congress gave the President a line item veto. It was introduced by Bob Dole in the Senate, and signed into law by Bill Clinton. The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 was subsequently ruled unconstitutional.
The line-item veto would allow the President to veto just certain items in an appropriations bill. However, it was ruled unconstitutional and so is not allowed in the US.
Line-item veto.
Yes