There was not such a thing as 5 major territories controlled by Rome. The Roman Empire was subdivided into provinces. By the end of the Roman Republic the Empire had 16 provinces. By the end of the reign of Augustus, the first Roman emperor, there were 28 provinces. Under the reign of Claudius there were 36. Under Marcus Aurelius there were 44. By 214 A.D. there were 48. Under Aurelian (who gave up Dacia) there were 46. In the late third century Diocletian reorganised the provinces. He reduced their sizes and doubled them.
Egypt, Britain, Spain, Gaul (france), and Greece.
Sydne Rome is 5' 5".
Rome Shadanloo is 5' 2".
Rome Kanda is 5' 11".
1. Revenues from taxes. 2. Slaves and profits from the sale thereof. 3. Territory in the conquered territories to settle its retired soldiers on. 4. Stability and peace in the region. 5. etc etc.
1. Raising an army made of conscripted allies from the conquered Spanish territories.2. Marching it to Italy from Spain.3. Defeating the Roman forces several times.4. Enlisting allies form the Gauls of northern Italy and, after his victory at Cannae, Rome's allies in southern Italy .5. Keeping pressure on the cities which remained supporting Rome.6. Not going to Rome - he did not have a siege train to reduce the city.
5 was once V in ancient Rome
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
V
It is the number 5.
Three of those statements are true: (2) Kush controlled all of Egypt at one point - 25th Pharaonic Dynasty AND (4) Rome invaded Kush (unsuccessfully) - Rome tried to conquer Kush around 22 B.C.E. and had Petronius lead the attack. However, the Kushites were able to defeat this invasion and established peaceful relations with Rome afterward AND (5) Kush was conquered by Aksum. (1), and (3) are false. Since the Aksumites conquered Kush, it could not have been the Greeks. Since Kush was in Sudan and Egypt, it was not in Saudi Arabia.
5 years.