0
Answer: There are a number of possible consequences of teaching creationism. The context and manner in which it is taught could also play a significant part in the consequences. Some of the possible options are set out below.
1. Students gain a greater understanding of what creationism actually is and what it isn't.
2. Students gain a deeper understanding of the basis of true science and of the scientific method.
3. Students gain knowledge of the creationist assumptions behind many great scientists of both the past and the present day.
4. Students come to understand how creationist belief has never stifled true science (contrary to much Propaganda) but actually encouraged it.
5. Students become aware of how evolutionary belief (the main alternative belief to creationism) has stifled science in a number of key areas .e;g; belief in vestigial organs and junk DNA.
6. Students come to understand the part that beliefs or presuppositions play in science.
7. Students discover some or much of the scientific evidences that support creationist arguments.
8. Students learn to think for themselves and learn to evaluate and reason logically from evidence to reach valid conclusions.
9. Students gain an interest in creationist research and develope an ambition to conduct research of their own.
Many creationists of course understand that teaching creationism, if done by a person either ignorant or opposed to it could have an entirely negative impact and for this reason they are not in favor of it being taught in the public school classroom.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Teaching creationism in schools can blur the line between science and religion, potentially misleading students about the nature of scientific inquiry. It may also inhibit critical thinking skills by promoting a belief system that relies on faith rather than evidence-based reasoning. Additionally, it can marginalize minority religious beliefs and create divisions within communities.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Should public schools teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes?
No, public schools should not teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes because creationism is not based on scientific evidence and is considered a religious belief. Science classes should focus on teaching scientifically supported theories and concepts. Students can explore creationism in a religious studies class or outside of the science curriculum.
What are the pros and cons of teaching creationism in school?
Pros of teaching creationism: It provides an alternative perspective for students to consider, encourages critical thinking, and allows for discussion of diverse beliefs. Cons of teaching creationism: It may conflict with scientific evidence, promote a specific religious ideology, and potentially undermine the teaching of evolution in science education.
What is the current status of the teaching of evolution and creationism?
In many educational settings, evolution is taught as a scientific theory supported by evidence, while creationism is often excluded due to its religious nature. Some areas in the United States have faced debates about the inclusion of creationism in science curricula, but courts have consistently ruled against its mandatory inclusion in public school science classes.
Why should creationism not be taught in school?
Creationism is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence. Teaching creationism in schools violates the separation of church and state mandated by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Science classes should focus on teaching scientifically supported theories like evolution to ensure students receive a comprehensive and accurate education.
Why is creationism not taught in schools?
Creationism is not typically taught in schools because it is considered a religious belief rather than a scientific theory. In public schools in the United States, teaching creationism alongside evolution would violate the separation of church and state. Additionally, the scientific community widely accepts evolution as a fundamental concept in biology while creationism lacks empirical evidence and is based on faith.
Is teaching creationism illegal?
Creationism is the basis of all religions, it is what science says is not true. Teaching it in a public school is illegal.
Are there questions about creationism on standardized tests?
Creationism questions are not typically found on standardized tests, as these exams are designed to assess proficiency in academic subjects based on established scientific knowledge and frameworks. Creationism is a topic that is often considered religious or philosophical in nature, and may not align with the science-based content that standardized tests aim to measure.
Should public schools teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes?
No, public schools should not teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes because creationism is not based on scientific evidence and is considered a religious belief. Science classes should focus on teaching scientifically supported theories and concepts. Students can explore creationism in a religious studies class or outside of the science curriculum.
What is the current status of the teaching of evolution and creationism?
In many educational settings, evolution is taught as a scientific theory supported by evidence, while creationism is often excluded due to its religious nature. Some areas in the United States have faced debates about the inclusion of creationism in science curricula, but courts have consistently ruled against its mandatory inclusion in public school science classes.
What occurred when the teaching of evolution was challenged by fundamentalists?
I think it was 1987 when the Supreme Court ruled that no state could block the teaching of evolution and that creationism was religion and violated the Establishment Clause of the Constitution.
What are the pros and cons of teaching creationism in school?
Pros of teaching creationism: It provides an alternative perspective for students to consider, encourages critical thinking, and allows for discussion of diverse beliefs. Cons of teaching creationism: It may conflict with scientific evidence, promote a specific religious ideology, and potentially undermine the teaching of evolution in science education.
Which states use creationism in biology curriculum?
None. In 1987 the Supreme Court of the United States of America heard the case of Edwards v. Aguillard, which argued that a Louisiana law requiring the teaching of creationism along side evolution was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed.
What is spiritual creationism?
Spiritual creationism is the belief that a divine being or force created the universe and all living beings. It typically involves the idea that this creation is purposeful and imbued with spiritual significance, over purely materialistic explanations. This concept is often associated with religious beliefs.
Is scientific Creationism is example of applied science?
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
What has the author Rod Butterworth written?
Rod Butterworth has written: 'Did God really say that?' -- subject(s): Bible, Creation, Evidences, authority, Biblical teaching, Inspiration, Creationism
When was creationism taught in public schools?
Biblical creation was taught as fact in United States public schools until the latter part of the nineteenth century, because it was simply assumed that the Bible explained what really happened. From the late nineteenth century until the 1920s, the Theory of Evolution was accepted in the United States more or less without comment, and slowly began to be taught in schools. Then, in the early 1920s, a number of southern state legislatures began to pass legislation banning the teaching of evolution in public schools. It was the Tennessee law that was challenged in the infamous Scopes Trial of 1921, leading to creationism being withdrawn from public school science curriculums.The teaching of creationism having been found to be unconstitutional, attempts were then made over the following decades to have creationism taught alongside evolution, to rebadge creationism as 'science' in order to satisfy constitutional requirements, and to place stickers in science textbooks, to undermine acceptance of evolution and draw attention to creationism. All these attempts appear to have failed.For more information on the creationism debate, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is a scientific view on creationism?
The scientific view on creationism is that there is no scientific evidence supporting it.
