The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
- Ratification process
- Absence of any mention of God
- Denial to the States of a power to print money
- Greatly increased powers of the central government
- Lack of Bill of Rights
For Certain rights to be protected
People who favored ratification of the new Constitution were called
they supported the right to tax the country, the ratification of the constitution, and they supported a strong central [federal] government
The main role of the Federalist Papers was to raise support for the ratification of the Constitution.
The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
to stress the need for ratification of the Constitution
to stress the need for ratification of the Constitution
They believed that the Constitution diminished states' rights.
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The need for a stronger central government.