woodlice can dry out so its main habitat is a wet place
the natural habitat of syberian crane is sea lakes jeels &other water bodies
Natural habitation might be the natural habitat of animals on the other hand its just us humans making the animals place in a zoo like their natural habitat
In its natural environment the frog is a part of the ecosystem, but as an invasive species it eats other frogs and is regarded as a plague. In its natural habitat the frog is preyed by its natural enemies and parasites, wich are absent in a non-natural habitat.
people killing animals or deforestation or an other natural cause
Among other places, most famously they mate in Antarctica.
A habitat is the natural home or environment of an animal, plant, or other organism
Yes all animals should have habitats that are natural to their species. unfortunately many animals nowadays have been forced to move out of their natural habitats and adapt into other, less natural habitats. However if one animal moves to a different habitat it is still considered a habitat, simply not its natural one.
I believe it could be both. A natural loss of habitat may be caused by flooding or a forest fire for instance. - A man made loss of habitat could be caused by building a highway or cutting down a forest.
The natural habitat of the Polecat is native to western Eurasia and Northern Africa. It isn't a very territorial animal as it allows other animals to share the same home range as itself.
No ! They would never encounter each other in their natural habitat ! Also - they need totally different living conditions ! Additionally - Chinese Water Dragons prey includes of small reptiles !
Because it couldn't survive in conditions other than its own.
Obviously the same as every other bird in the world. Any other dumb questions?