Australia's colonisation was neither good or bad. The concept of colonisation is completely fine- it was how the English colonised Australia that is seen as particually bad and forceful.
To answer your question, it was good because it was in fact, early globalisation. Which created diversity in the world, and Australia. If Australia was never colonised, Indigenous Australians would never have made contact with other people, and vice versa.
Australia provides the world with many resources. In 2008 alone, Australia exported about 54,712,000 dollars worth of coal, and 34,239,000 dollars worth of Iron Ore & concentrates- just to name a few.
As stated before, it was bad because of how it was colonised; Also, foreign diseases posed serious threats to Australia. Even now, Australian border control is really tough.
Medisonss :)
positive impacts are: computers are better negative impacts are: there are non
there are no positive impacts when an earthquake happens, it only causes misery and destruction
Positive impacts-lower wood costs
there was no positive impacts from Love Canal it should of never happened in the first place
Positive impacts of Jacques Cartier include his exploration of Canada, which led to increased knowledge of the region and its resources. He also established French claims to North America, paving the way for future French colonization efforts. Negative impacts include his mistreatment of Indigenous peoples, including kidnapping and taking them back to France, as well as the spread of disease to Indigenous communities.
Dukedom
Because I think it impacts trade...
it was when the europeans settled in australia
Mel Gibson
there aren't any
faster