Want this question answered?
An absolute ruler in the empire under the republic form of government was a dictator. Under the principate the "emperor"was the absolute ruler at all times.
People living under the Pharaohs basically had no rights as we know them. The rulers were absolute rulers.
Economic statistics are a modern phenomenon. In historic times it was not the international consideration it is today. When countries had an absolute ruler and that ruler required fiscal support he or she "taxed" the people under him/her. Who, in turn, taxed those under them. There was no overall national economy, merely an ability to raise a certain amount for a specific purpose.
The ancient Egyptian ruler was considered to be a living god, so naturally he outranked the priesthood and everyone else.
The father had absolute power.
There are two questions here:How did absolutism affect the rights of the people?Absolutism concentrates all power into one person, which means that human rights are very constricted. It is almost inexorable that human rights decrease under absolutism.How did absolutism affect the future of the people?The main advantage of absolute monarchy is order. By concentrating all power in one person, absolute monarchy permits an unprecedented level of order and control over the various regions of the state. Unfortunately, then, the quality of the government is heavily dependent on the quality of the one person ruling it and, as a result, the future of the people is completely dependent on the absolute ruler. Generally, under a good absolute ruler, like Suleiman the Magnificent, people's lives improved, trade increased, and the empire acquired wealth through conquest. Generally under a poor absolute ruler, like Louis XVI, chaos and revolution would result from inflexibility in regards to changing societies.
Under the reign of Louis XIV the government in France was an Absolute Monarchy.
Osiris was the ruler of the underworld in ancient Egypt.
The ruler of where? Never mind. I see the question is under the category of English history.
Inca ruler in about 1438
It was difficult to unite the Fertile Crescent under one ruler cauae or effect ?
Engand & France were becoming nations unified under a single ruler.