A parliamentary system, also known as parliamentarianism , is a system of government in which the executive is dependent on the direct or indirect support of the legislature (often termed the parliament), often expressed through a vote of confidence. Parliamentary systems are characterized by no clear-cut separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches, leading to a different set of checks and balances compared to those found in presidential systems. Parliamentary systems usually have a clear differentiation between the head of government and the head of state, with the head of government being the prime minister or premier, and the head of state often being a figurehead, often either a president (elected either popularly or by the parliament) or by a hereditary monarch (often in a constitutional monarchy). Though in parliamentary systems the prime minister and cabinet will exercise executive power on a day-to-day basis, constitutional authority will usually belong to the head of state, giving that official codified or uncodified reserve powers. The term parliamentary systemdoes not mean that a country is ruled by different parties in coalition with each other. Such multi-party arrangements are usually the product of an electoral system known as proportional representation. Many parliamentary countries, especially those that use "first past the post" voting, have governments composed of one party. However, parliamentary systems in continental Europe do use proportional representation, and tend to produce election results in which no single party has a majority of seats. Proportional representation in a non-parliamentary system obviously does not have this result. Parliamentarianism may also be for governance in local governments. An example is the city of Oslo, which has an executive council as a part of the parliamentary system. The council-manager system of municipal government used in some U.S. cities bears many similarities to a parliamentary system.
parliamentary system is advantageous in a sense that it is fast and covinient when it comes to decision making
more than one man's decision is not prone to subjection
pros: presidents so lehed of government cons: presidents not head of government
Pr
Pros could be professionals, or they could be arguments in favor of something (as opposed to cons).
there were many layers
pros- meaning advantages; positivescons- meaning disadvantages; negatives
There are many pros and cons on this issue. Are you a proor a con? We're looking for someone to speak for the benefits because we have someone to speak for the deficits.
A pro of a parliamentary democracy is that it is representative of the will of the people. A con is that it can be difficult to get bills passed because of the varied opinions represented.
pros and cons of physiocrats
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect
What are the pros and cons of transformational leadership?
Pros of fascism: centralized authority can lead to efficient decision-making and implementation of policies, promoting national unity and stability. However, cons include suppression of individual freedoms, lack of political diversity, and the potential for authoritarianism to lead to abuse of power and human rights violations.
pros= nothing cons=everything