"Incumbents" means the congressmen who are already in office. Because they can bring projects to their district, help people with government problems in their district, and raise more campaign money by being in office already, it is very hard for someone else to run against them.
As simple answer to your question is that most incumbents have a history and a record to run on, while most new candidates don't have a strong record established yet
Senators represent a wider-spread district area than representatives. This way there are more people that can run for office for the Senate.
The writers of our Constitution wanted to balance the wisdom of the Senators with the House Members' response to the ever changing public opinion.
Incumbents in all elections hold an advantage because people are reluctant to change.
house members are reelected about 90% of the time.
senate members are reelected about 80% of the time.
Both have very high rates due to their incumbent advantage over newcomers.
Incumbents typically have an advantage due to greater name recognition over their opponent (though of course this is not always the case) and the fact that there will be many voters grateful for the help they have offered whilst in office eg. A city councillor helping someone with a planning concern
Some of the things that account for the success of political candidates are commercials and well-run debates. Other things include taking credit for positive things that have happened in the government, and taking a strong stand on issues that are important to the voters in their base.
That it will always be there.
U.S. Presidential elections are always on the first Tuesday of November, and Congressional elections are also typically held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
The after-tax cost of debt will almost always be below
It isn't almost always on the 4th floor.
They are almost always green.
Eric Le Borgne has written: 'Do elections always motivate incumbents?' -- subject(s): Civil service, Incumbency (Public officers), Election, Production functions (Economic theory)
Almost always. Almost every time.
almost always.
No - almost always not.
(almost) always