Want this question answered?
Interpretations change to reflect society.
Congress can not make informal changes to the constitution. The only ways that the constitution can be changed is if 2/3 of the states ratify the change, or a constitutional convention takes place.
Supreme Court
Courts have jurisdiction over interpretations of the constitution and can suggest amendments. The supreme court was the only one mentioned in the US constitution.
Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences.
I am only going to tell you one because I cant think of another. Christopher Columbus Didn't Discover America.
You doing We the People too?
Daniel Webster believed that the American people, acting through their elected representatives in Congress, had the power to amend and change the Constitution. He argued that constitutional amendments should be pursued to address issues and adapt to changing circumstances, rather than engaging in loose interpretations of the Constitution by the judiciary.
The constitution can be changed by a process called amendment. This typically involves proposing a change and then ratifying it through a specified mechanism outlined in the existing constitution.
The amendment process makes sure the constitution can change and adjust to needs and new issues.
I know some views that the Republicans have on the United States Constitution. I also know twelve ways that the Republicans want to change the U.S. Constitution. There is no straight-on election of senators
Laws passed by Congress and judicial decisions are two things that have caused new interpretations of the Constitution. A changing and evolving society is another cause.