The Missouri Compromise - because it banned slavery in some zones, while the Constitution protected a man's property, including (as the founding fathers had presumably meant it) slave property.
The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man
i dont give a s**t kk
The Dred Scott decision
i dont give a s**t kk
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
People of all states could decide if they wanted slavery withing their borders. A+Ls: The supreme court declared scott was a free man
The South was delighted with this decision - it declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
i dont know you tell me