You didn't really provide enough info here. The 1969 Dodge charger came with several engine options. The charger with a 383 wouldn't be at all competitve in this race. The 440 six pack might be a better race and the 426 hemi would be real close. I think the Mustang would probably win but I do think it would be close. If you check Motor Trend or road and track from the era I'm almost positive you'll find a head to head test somewhere.
The Cobra had like 500 ponies and was setup to race. The Cryco 440 push around 425 hp, weight a ton, in a race not even close. The Mustang's dropping would be dry before the Dodge got there !!
The Dodge Shelby Charger (1983-194) and Shelby Dodge Charger (1985-1987) were two Dodge automobiles. They were modified Carroll Shelby, a former Formula 1 driver, from earlier designs.
A dodge charger would run faster because of its motor and depends on how it was designed.
Dodge charger, only by a couple mph because it has better aerodynamics.
Lamborghini.
that question is a joke right?, the charger is faster hands down.
The Challenger will be faster due to more horsepower [(375bhp); Charger: 370bhp]and more torque: Challenger 410lb ft; Charger 400lb ft
For the same models compared: yes
Absolutely
mustang is faster with 432 horse power
The SRT8 (either Challenger or Charger) will be faster than a RT. The SRT8 has the 6.1L Hemi, while the RT has the 5.7L.
ford made the shelby dodge made the charger and ther challenger mainly ford,dodge,chevy
the charger should be faster. nah me and my friends tried this them chargers are slow my 94 impalas smoked a charger