0
What led to the uneasy relationship between Major General Joseph Hooker and General in Chief Henry Wager Halleck?
ChuckSiata
As head of the Army of the Potomac, General Hooker had a substantial troop advantage at the Battle of Chancellorsville. Yet, he lost this battle to Robert E. Lee. US President Lincoln then appointed General Meade to replace Hooker. Chancellorsville was perhaps the best victory of Robert E. Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoUS President Lincoln decided to replace General John Pope with General Joseph Hooker to lead the Army of the Potomac in 1863. Hooker would only accept the position on the condition that he would report directly to Lincoln. This action not only by passed General in Chief Henry Wager Halleck but also bypassed the US Secretary of War Edward Stanton. There is little evidence that Stanton was annoyed, but the relatively new General in Chief Henry Wager Halleck clearly did not like this arrangement. And nor should he have.In this case, President Lincoln made a clear error by interfereing in the military chain of high command. Historians might have ignored this had Hooker been successful. With that said, Hooker did not meet any "success standards" and would be replaced by Major General George Mead.
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoUnion General Joseph Hooker was embarrassed at his loss to Confederate General Lee at the 1863 Battle of Chancellorsville. More so in that Hooker had a huge troop advantage. As the next phase of Union actions were discussed, Hooker believed his loss required a resignation.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were the views of Union General in Chief Henry Halleck concerning the Army of the Potomac in 1863?
General in Chief Henry W. Halleck was deeply involved in Union operations in Virginia in 1863. As the Summer approached, Halleck believed that Union General Joseph Hooker, commanding the Army of the Potomac would have to react to General Robert E. Lee's actions in northern Virginia. He believed that it was possible for Lee to pin Hooker back into defending Washington DC, and at the same time conduct a raid into Maryland and Pennsylvania. Halleck assured Hooker that if needed he would reinforce Hooker with troops from the Shenandoah Valley and from West Point.
How did Union General Henry W Halleck reorganize the command structure in the Eastern Theater?
As General Joseph Hooker was doing his best to boost the morale of the Army of the Potomac, and being credited with his great success, Halleck, under fire from US President Lincoln, began to reorganize the command structure in the Eastern Theater. This was a challenge, and a major reason was the fact that Lincoln believed that Halleck had failed in more than one way to correctly exercise his role as general in chief. Because of that, General Hooker convinced Lincoln that he could break the normal chain of command and report directly to President Lincoln. This was a serious flaw by any military measure.With that said, Halleck took the following measures:* He placed the troops at Harper's Ferry and troops in the Shenandoah Valley under the command of Major General Robert Schenck;* Halleck reassigned the 9th Corps of the Army of the Potomac to Major General Dix at Fort Monroe; and* Halleck retained Major General Heintzelman as commander of the Washington DC defense troops.Halleck believed that these armies were too weak to defend themselves and ordered General Hooker to support them from the Army of the Potomac as needed.Lincoln again stepped in to break the chain of command by offering Hooker command of the Washington DC garrison, bur Hooker declined.Halleck was able to give to Hooker the same instructions that Lincoln had approved for the last commander of the Army of the Potomac, General Burnside, the command to focus on destroying Lee's army.
Was General Hooker in the Union army?
Yes he was.
Who was the union general at chancelorsville?
Joseph Hooker
What general lost in the Battle of Chancellorsville?
Joe Hooker
What was the advice of General in Chief Henry W Halleck regarding Union Major General Joseph Hooker?
Both US president Lincoln and General in Chief Henry Wager Halleck were displeased with general Joseph hooker. They believed that Hooker's response to Lee's crossing of the Potomac River was late and unresponsive to the needs of the Union. This required a change and Halleck's choice of General Meade to replace Hooker was in line with President Lincoln's views on the matter.
What were the views of Union General in Chief Henry Halleck concerning the Army of the Potomac in 1863?
General in Chief Henry W. Halleck was deeply involved in Union operations in Virginia in 1863. As the Summer approached, Halleck believed that Union General Joseph Hooker, commanding the Army of the Potomac would have to react to General Robert E. Lee's actions in northern Virginia. He believed that it was possible for Lee to pin Hooker back into defending Washington DC, and at the same time conduct a raid into Maryland and Pennsylvania. Halleck assured Hooker that if needed he would reinforce Hooker with troops from the Shenandoah Valley and from West Point.
What was the result of the June 1863 meeting between Lincoln Hooker Halleck and Stanton?
On June 23, 1863, President Lincoln, generals Hooker and Halleck and Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton held a meeting at the War Department. The goal of the meeting was how best to handle Confederate General Lee's incursion into the North. One disaster there was that the meeting ended without General Hooker knowing exactly what troops would be under his command.
How did Union General Henry W Halleck reorganize the command structure in the Eastern Theater?
As General Joseph Hooker was doing his best to boost the morale of the Army of the Potomac, and being credited with his great success, Halleck, under fire from US President Lincoln, began to reorganize the command structure in the Eastern Theater. This was a challenge, and a major reason was the fact that Lincoln believed that Halleck had failed in more than one way to correctly exercise his role as general in chief. Because of that, General Hooker convinced Lincoln that he could break the normal chain of command and report directly to President Lincoln. This was a serious flaw by any military measure.With that said, Halleck took the following measures:* He placed the troops at Harper's Ferry and troops in the Shenandoah Valley under the command of Major General Robert Schenck;* Halleck reassigned the 9th Corps of the Army of the Potomac to Major General Dix at Fort Monroe; and* Halleck retained Major General Heintzelman as commander of the Washington DC defense troops.Halleck believed that these armies were too weak to defend themselves and ordered General Hooker to support them from the Army of the Potomac as needed.Lincoln again stepped in to break the chain of command by offering Hooker command of the Washington DC garrison, bur Hooker declined.Halleck was able to give to Hooker the same instructions that Lincoln had approved for the last commander of the Army of the Potomac, General Burnside, the command to focus on destroying Lee's army.
How did US President Lincoln wish to use the Army of the Potomac in the Spring of 1863?
As positive events were taking place for the Union in the Western Theater, US President Lincoln and General Henry Wager Halleck knew all to well that the population in the North was more focused on Virginia and Richmond then Union achievements out west and were in a sense "faraway" from the Confederate's irritating operations in Virginia. A state within grasp of the Union's premier Army of the Potomac. With General Joseph Hooker now in command, it was expected that "Fighting Joe Hooker" would succeed where generals McClellan and Burnside had failed. At this point in time, Halleck was of less influence in the East then ever before. He had not disappeared, however. By the end of March 1863, Halleck pressed for action in Virginia. Since General Lee has sent General Longstreet to defend on the east coast, Lee's army was weaker, and Halleck pressed for a heavy blow to end Lee's dominance of Virginia and his defense of Richmond. President Lincoln agreed and so did General Hooker. In a sense Hooker made a mistake against himself by taking command of the Army of the Potomac and asking to report only to President Lincoln. In early April Lincoln and Halleck met with General Hooker only to find that he and his commanders were in disagreement on the method to attack Lee's weakened army. By reporting to Lincoln, Hooker seemed to gain a step ahead of the other major commanders but it was a two edged sword. Lincoln, using his best judgment, influenced Hooker not only on an operational basis but also even in tactical detail. And, it would be to Lincoln that Hooker would send his operational plans for the upcoming contest between himself and General Lee. In private, away from Hooker's other commanders at a dinner, Lincoln gave to Hooker and one general, General Couch, second in command of the Army of the Potomac, his views on how Hooker's plan would become acceptable to himself. This is documented in various post war papers of various participants. The bottom line here is that despite all his good intentions, Halleck was a better judge of the soon to come Hooker plans to destroy Lee and put an end to the irritating Richond, 100 miles away. Hooker, however, did not report to Halleck.
What elements did General Halleck bring to the position of general in chief for the Union?
Major General Henry W. Halleck was a good choice to replace General George B. McClellan as the Union's new general in chief. He had what President Lincoln was looking for. Halleck was a West Point graduate with genuine prestige. This sat well with the army and the general public. Halleck also had already established a strong loyalty among the Union's western commanders. He would be new to the Eastern Theater, and this required all of his skills to deal with the eastern officers such as Burnside, Hooker and McClellan. General Pope would also move to the East, however, Halleck already knew of his abilities.
What was the reason Union General Joseph Hooker resigned his position as commander of the Army of the Potomac?
Reportedly Major General Joseph Hooker resigned as the commander of the Army of the Potomac due to a dispute with General in Chief Henry W. Halleck. Hooker believed he did not have the confidence of the Lincoln administration. Hooker wanted to evacuate Harpers Ferry and use his troops to attack that portion of Lee's army not yet over the Potomac River. This would cut off Lee's lines of communication. Halleck, however, wanted the troops to remain at Harpers Ferry which allowed for the protection of Washington DC and Baltimore.
Who recommended that Major General George G. Meade take command of the Army of the Potomac in 1863?
In late June of 1863, President Lincoln became dissatisfied with General Hooker's plans to challenge General Robert E. Lee's advance into Pennsylvania. He relieved Hooker and took the advice of General in Chief Halleck's advice to replace Hooker with Major General George G. Meade. Meade had been a corps commander with the Army of the Potomac.
Who provided Major General Hooker with advice on how to handle General Lee's advance into Union territory?
After General Joseph's meeting at the War Department on June 23, 1863, he returned to the Army of the Potomac. Hooker needed guidance and one of his engineering officers was Brigadier General G.K. Warren. He had provided excellent information on roadways and possible fords on the Potomac River. Warren advised Hooker to immediately move the army to Harpers Ferry. At least one half of Lee's army was there, the other half on the way to Pennsylvania. It was already known that Lee's potential target was Harrisburg. If Hooker could hold Harpers Ferry, he would be in a strong military and logistical position and also be in position to defend both Baltimore and Washington DC. Halleck saw problems with Hooker's approach to the situation. With Lincoln already displeased with Hooker, Lincoln took Halleck's advice and replaced Hooker with Major General George G. Meade.
What caused Union General In Chief Henry W Halleck to become disappointed with General Joseph Hooker?
General Joseph Hooker was a veteran commander and now headed the vaunted Army of the Potomac. In Virginia he had a two to one advantage over Confederate forces there. All seemed secure with 45,000 troops guarding Washington DC, and 21,000 troops in the Shenandoah Valley.As was seen just prior to Lee's invasion of Pennsylvania, having these troops removed from the Valley, and baffling Hooker's army, was a set of operations not to be fulfilled until the Summer of 1863. With that said, Halleck, unaware of what Lee's plans were to be, he pressed Hooker to do something with his huge troop advantage. Halleck had specific ideas in mind, however, Hooker did nothing. This caused Lincoln to also be puzzled and he and Halleck paid a visit to Hooker and find out what Hooker's plans were. Apparently the action of no action was due to Hooker and his generals debating as to the best way to attack Lee and move on to Richmond. After lecturing Hooker on the best way to advance, Lincoln also saw fit to remind Hooker not to make the mistakes he saw in McClellan and Burnside. That being those generals' caution of keeping too many troops in reserve in case of a problem. Lincoln believed that the reserves should be minimal and all the troops needed to make a successful assault on Lee be used. Lincoln's rational was the large army that Hooker had. Here again, it is seen that too much planning by Lincoln may have been over the top.
Where did Union General Joseph Hooker's plan to attack the Army of Northern Virginia originate?
Headquarters in Washington DC devised a plan like US Grant's for him: a turning movement against the enemy's left flank. But even Hooker's great numerical superiority would not help him to succeed. Reportedly, General in Chief Henry W. Halleck devised both battle plans of Grant's and Hooker's.
How serious were communications problems in Washington DC in the Summer of 1863?
Communication problems were at a point of critical mass as General Hooker was unable to receive proper commands from Washington DC. Although Halleck had clearly outlined what his beliefs were regarding the movements of General Lee's army, he did not render any orders to General Hooker.Halleck believed he had no place to do so. President Lincoln also furnished no orders. He believed that he should defer to Halleck's superior military knowledge. As for General Hooker, he lacked the confidence to proceed based on his own military expertise. He was in charge of the Union's premier army. He had the chance to attack Lee's rear guard as Lee marched northward, bur Hooker did nothing. Clearly at this vital juncture in the war, the Union command system was broken.
