answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the rise of Hinduism

User Avatar

Randal Bernhard

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What caused the indo aryan social system to change?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

How is India's caste system different from the Aryan social class system?

India's caste system is different from the Aryan social class because the Indian's marriages were only permitted only between persons of the same class. I hope I was a help!


What is the caste system a result of?

hinduNOVA NET: **Aryan**


The caste system is a result of what influence?

hinduNOVA NET: **Aryan**


How do you contrast the caste system with a class system?

So..... you wanna know how the Indian caste system is different to the American class system. Here, I'll help you. The Indian caste system, or varna came about when the Aryans began speaking nomadic groups came to India about 1500 BC. The Aryan priests divided society into a caste system with four parts. The priests( Brachmins) were the highest varna, the second caste was Kshatriyas, or rulers and warriors. Third in ran was the vaisyas( farmers, craftspeople and traders.) and the lowest ranking was the sudras and they were the workers and servants. People couldn't change their caste. They had to marry and socialize with people from their own caste. In the United States class is determined by how much wealth you have, not usually by your occupation. The 3 classes are upper class, middle class, and lower class. Most Americans fall into middle class or lower class with the very wealthiest people in the upper class. In American society, you aren't forced into one class. Our system is not based on religion like the caste system is. Hope that answers your question!! And i hope somebody answer the question to this. Compare the Indian caste system to the American class system.


What best describes social Darwinism?

Darwinism is a term often used to refer to classical Darwinian evolution by natural selection, but also to the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis. The term is sometimes used in a derogatory fashion by those rejecting evolutionary theory for religious reasons, and is considered outdated by many, but is nevertheless still used by some scientists, such as Richard Dawkins.Not to be confused with social Darwinism, which is an ideology applying evolutionary explanations in answering moral questions: making an ought from an is, sometimes known as the naturalistic fallacy.