0
Why would the compromise on counting slaves be called the three-fifths compromise?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Instead of counting all slaves for population to determine electoral votes, they only counted slaves as 3/5 of a person to calculate the electoral votes. Before this they didn't count any of the slaves as part of the population when calculating electoral votes.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe conflict in the Constitutional Convention between large and small states.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The compromise between the north and south states over counting the slaves was called?
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.
During the Constitutional convention this compromise by delegates dealt with the counting of enslaved people?
North-South Compromise! I'm 100% sure. actually its the three-foruths compromise and it said that 3 out of ever 4 slaves would be counted as one person for the population
The plan that required slaves to count as part of a person for taxation and voting purposes was called?
Connecticut compromise
What is the conflict and compromise in slaves and the sugar islands?
IT IS A CONFLICT AND COMPROMISE BECAUSE THEY SOLD SLAVES FOR SUGR AND SOME PEOPLE DIDNT AGREE WITH THIS.
What was the signifigance of the three-fifths compromise?
The 3/5ths compromise was significant because it help benefit the south with more representation in voting. It counted 3/5ths of all slaves which gave the south more votes because slaves were more abundant .This had to do with counting population for the purpose of legal representation in Congress. The issue was weather or not to count slaves. Some wanted to count them and some didn't. They worked it out with a compromise. The slaves were counted but they only counted as three fifths each. That way nobody got what they wanted. It was not a good solution but it was something they were able to agree upon at the time. I hope this helps.
The compromise between the north and south states over counting the slaves was called?
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.
How did delegates settle the problem of slaves counting towards a states population?
3/5 Compromise
How did the delegates compromise about enslaved people?
By using the 3/5ths compromise.Only counting 3 out 5 slaves to be counted as 1.
What are the 3 compromises of the great compromise?
3/5 ratio for counting slaves, representation in the legislature, and the method of electing a president.
How did the northern states feel about counting the slaves?
The northern states were smaller states so they were out numbered by the south where the most,political power was located. The idea to count the slaves was a compromise so that other things could get done. Often people have to compromise to get something they want and this is what happened.
This compromise proposed the method to count a states population by counting the free citizens and a fraction of all others?
The three-fifths compromise was proposed as a way of counting slaves for the purpose of representation in the House. The northerners didn't want them to get more representatives because of so many non-voting people.
During the Constitutional convention this compromise by delegates dealt with the counting of enslaved people?
North-South Compromise! I'm 100% sure. actually its the three-foruths compromise and it said that 3 out of ever 4 slaves would be counted as one person for the population
How did William Paterson feel about counting slaves as part of the population?
William Paterson believed that counting slaves as part of the population would give more political power to states with larger slave populations, potentially increasing their representation in government. He opposed such a practice and advocated for counting slaves as three-fifths of a person in determining representation in Congress, as outlined in the Three-Fifths Compromise during the Constitutional Convention.
In debates leading up to the three fifths compromise, Northern states argued that?
Slaves should not be included when counting a states population to determine representation in congress. (APEX)
How did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention deal with slavery?
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
Should slaves be counted in the population?
The issue of counting slaves in the population is complex and has historical implications. In terms of representation, counting slaves would have given slaveholding states more political power in early American history. However, excluding slaves would have misrepresented the true population size. Ultimately, the decision to count slaves as part of the population was a compromise reached during the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
In debates leading up the the Three-fifths Compromise southern states argued that?
Slaves should be counted when counting a state’s population to determine representation in congress
