Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience
pseudoscience fake science basically and scince made technology build things
Palm reading is a pseudoscience. Practitioners give vague claims that cannot be substainciated, and use selective reporting of cases where a random statement happened to be true.
No
A pseudoscience technically isn't a science. Pseudosciences are practices/doctrines/disciplines that are similar to the hard sciences but lacks the empirical testing system that defines the hard sciences. Astrology would be an example of a pseudoscience.
Only one, really: it disregards conflicting data.
Observation, in a scientific sense, has the key attributes of objectivity and repeatability. Pseudoscience are non-scientific subjects which are discussed in a scientific way. Although several criteria have been identified as characteristic of pseudoscience, the key things are claiming that a subject is "scientific" without conforming to the scientific method.
science is real and pseudoscience is fake
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience
Science is not pseudoscience. The former is authentic, the latter is fake.
Science is not pseudoscience. The former is authentic, the latter is fake.
Some consider the polygraph a pseudoscience because of the variability of the results of polygraphic testing.
Pseudoscience is a belief which is completely scientific and logical but there is no scientific method for it till now.
Pseudoscience is a claim that is presented as scientific, but lacks any supporting evidence, cannot be tested and does not adhere to a valid scientific method. A type of pseudoscience is "pop science."
science is real and pseudoscience is fake
pseudoscience fake science basically and scince made technology build things
Philosophy is a pseudoscience because it does not use the scientific method, and it involves opinion and beliefs.