Want this question answered?
Both should restate the essay’s main claim
Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.
Yes, an argument with true premises and a true conclusion can still be invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. Invalidity concerns the structure of the argument rather than the truth of the statements involved.
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
That's correct. The validity of an argument depends on both the form of the argument and the truth of the premises. If the premises are false, then even if the argument is logically valid, the conclusion cannot be considered true.
They were both men and they were both from Europe.
Long-distance trade exposes people to previously unknown ideas, peoples, and cultures.
For one, they both explored a different place. Marco Polo explored Asia in hope of finding new lands and trading in the market, while Henry Hudson explored the America in search of the Northwest indies, but switched to the americas after rumors of riches, fame, and luxury.
Because he relied on Marco Polo & Paolo Toscanelli who were both wrong on the size of Asia.
They were both European explorers.
Proof!
The Yuan Dynasty and Marco Polo were related, because they were both foreigners in the country China. Marco Polo trade anywhere because he will introduce the "Cathay". Suddenly, Marco realized that he is much friendlier of the Chinese, because at that time Chinese were pity.
In the first two voyages in Gulliver's Travels, Gulliver meets both very small and very large creatures.
Both places are very nice, but for my money Marco Island has much less Traffic and much easier to get around in.
They were both European explorers.
A conclusion about an observation is referred to as an inference or infer in short form. This is a method which allows you to reach conclusions based on observations.
To determine the inverse, negate both the hypothesis and conclusion.