Want this question answered?
Nuclear power plants, submarines and aircraft carriers propelled by nuclear reactors. In the future, may be all sort of vehicles could have small and very protected nuclear reactors instead of today's fuel.
It doesn't. What could have given you this idea??
Nuclear reactors are potentially dangerous and could not be allowed in vehicles on normal public roads
Yes, it generally is but a nuclear plant could refer to nuclear reactors which are basically the things that produce the power. So in essence, yes, a nuclear plant is the same thing as a nuclear power station
Plutonium Could it also include Neptunium? This I believe is also man made.
The world's power needs could be met with 7500 well placed reactors.
It cold be considered renewable as in some nuclear fission reactors; called breeder reactors; more fuel could be produced than what is consumed and on the other hand uranium is one of the most abundant minerals on earth crust and water. On the other hand, fusion nuclear energy is based on unlimited resources of deuterium and tritium.
Yes, it could be viewed as inexhaustible through use of breeder nuclear reactors that can produce more fuel that what is consumed.
It could be process heat (e,g, for district heating and water desalination) or electricity
Many scientists contributed to the WW2 Manhattan project. Enrico Fermi first demonstrated a chain reaction in a nuclear 'pile', so he could be considered the pioneer of power reactors.
No, the fuel used won't be weapons grade, just industrial grade. The fuel will get very hot though and could cause non nuclear explosions, which will cause radioactive dust to be released into the surroundings.
Currently, it can't. May be it could be in future.