most likely murder
It is an argument in support of the death penalty sentence. The Best Bet Argument for the death penalty states that though we are not 100% sure that it (the death penalty) will deter or prevent future murders/crimes, we assume that as a fear for this maximum punishment, it will deter future crimes. Criminals will fear the idea of the death penalty and will therefore not commit murders.
Crimes that should be punishable by death, but did not get the death penalty in recent times are; crimes of terror attack, and crimes against humanity.
that the death penalty for certain crimes (grad point) ;)
None. There is no death penalty in Mexico.
Proponents of the Death Penalty will argue that it is beneficial for at least two reasons. The first is that it prevents any further crimes from being committed by the alleged perpetrator. The second is that it serves as a strong deterrent to those considering indulging in violent (or other serious) crimes: the potential penalty of death will lead many such persons to choose not to commit offenses.
That would be those who are in favour of using the death penalty for punishment of severe crimes.
killing
Chile abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes. Chile's laws provide for the death penalty only for exceptional crimes such as crimes under military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances
Dont commit a crime EVER.
No, the majority of law enforcement officials believe that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing crimes.
No, currently the death penalty only applies to murder and high crimes like treason.
Treason