answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

that it would leave too much power in federal government and it would leave states weak

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What criticism of the constitution by anti-federalists seems to be the most valid and why?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

The federalists or the antifederalists had the more valid arguments?

There is no doubt that the Anti-Federalist had some very valid arguments but in many ways, their principles seemed to be flawed. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was an attempt to fuse the government into one nation and for them this would undermine any authority the states had. The contention of this argument was on the basis that, "there was an inherent connection between the states and the preservation of individual liberty, which is the end of any legitimate government.


What elements of the constitution can't be changed with an amendment?

this is not valid to my question.


How do you respond to criticism?

Respond to criticism by staying calm and avoiding becoming defensive. Listen actively to understand the feedback and acknowledge any valid points. Use criticism as an opportunity for self-reflection and growth.


What does the constitution say about debts contracted before the adoption of the constitution?

all depts contracted before the adoption of the constitution are valid against the united states under the constitution :)


Is the 1936 Russian Constitution still valid?

vaild till 1977.


How do you take constructive criticism?

You need to remember that constructive criticism is to improve the outcome. It offers valid and well-reasoned opinions about your work. It includes positive and negative comments offered in a friendly manner. Do not dwell on the word criticism in isolation


What country has a president and a constitution but no land?

A valid country needs some land.


Who wrote the Cuban Constitution?

Carlos Marquez Sterling wrote the Cuban Constitution. However, it had to be OK'd by the committee of the state in order to be valid.


A law that is not agreeable with the constitution and is not valid?

A law that goes against the constitution is considered unconstitutional and is not valid. This means that the law cannot be enforced, and individuals can challenge it in court to seek its invalidation. The constitution serves as the supreme law of the land, and any legislation conflicting with it is rendered void.


In order to evaluate moral judgements there must be a?

A valid criticism for moral absolutism is that In order to evaluate moral judgments there must be a ?


Your girl friend is obeying her parents wordit is dangerous for you how can you treat her to obey your word?

A successful relationship is based upon mutual agreement, not upon obedience to orders. If you want someone to obey your word, get a pet dog. They can be trained to obey. Girlfriends are another matter. As for her parents criticism of you, you can certainly discuss it with your girlfriend. The criticism either is valid or it isn't. I personally have no way of knowing. Even if the criticism is valid that doesn't mean that your relationship must fail. Perhaps there is something about you that can be improved.


How is the 4 amendment relevant to today?

It is no longer valid since George W Bush revoked the constitution in September 2001