No, the Intolerable Acts was a result of the Boston Tea Party. The Tea Act led to the Boston Tea Party
Yes off coz....
The tea was thrown off the docks in Boston into the Atlantic Ocean.
Samuel Adams goal for the Boston tea party was for the British to take the tax off the tea.
That was called the Boston Tea Party.
The tea party crashers were the people that did not like the tea tax. One night they dressed as Indians and they dumped all the tea off the boats.
They dumped the tea into the Boston harbor, thus the Boston Tea Party
The Boston Tea Party was actually not a war. Here is what it was, and what happened. The Tea Act passed. The colonists did not want to pay taxes. So, here is where the Boston Tea Party kicks in, one year after the Tea Act. Here is what you've been waiting for! The Boston Tea Party was an event that was three boats full of colonists. They cut open chests of tea and they dumped it in the Boston Harbor (harr-berr)! The colonists had to pay it off. So, the colonists named that law the Intolerable(in-toll-err-a-bowl) Act. So, the Boston Tea Party was not a war, but it was an event that the colonists responded to the Tea Act.
The king ordered the Boston port to be closed to imports and exports till all the tea wasted was paid off.
The Bostonians did not like the high import tariffs the British were putting on the tea.
The people just moaned. But an armed gang, probably in the pay of John Hancock, crept aboard ships of the British East India Company in Boston harbour and damaged 2 million dollars worth of tea. This criminal event was laughed off as the Boston Tea Party.
British were taxing a lot on tea. Boston people had to pay more than the Boston. They thought that wasn't fair so the got revenge. Boston people dressed liked Indians, and they threw the tea off the boat.